Relative Susceptibility of Whiteflies to Danital® + Orthone® Over a 5-year Period
dc.contributor.author | Castle, S. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ellsworth, P. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Prabhaker, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Toscano, N. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Henneberry, T. J. | |
dc.contributor.editor | Silvertooth, Jeff | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-17T18:35:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-17T18:35:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/211326 | |
dc.description.abstract | As part of a program to assess differences in susceptibility to insecticides among regional populations of Bemisia tabaci, insecticide resistance monitoring was carried out at the Maricopa Agricultural Center from fall, 1995 through 1999. Monitoring efforts were concentrated on Danitol®+Orthene® following reports of control problems and documentation of resistance to this mixture in 1995. We were interested in the longer-term dynamics of resistance in light of radically altered treatment regimens beginning with the use of IGRs in 1996. Although the frequency of susceptible individuals to Danitol+Orthene tended to increase in the later years, highly resistant individuals were still present 5 years after the resistance episode of 1995. Whitefly adults collected from various insecticide treatment plots other than Danitol+Orthene were generally uniform in their responses from the time of initial whitefly infestation until defoliation. However, a dramatic shift in susceptibility occurred following a single application of Danitol+Orthene in 1997 and 1999. The increased frequency of resistant individuals following treatment suggests that any large scale return to the use of Danitol+Orthene could rapidly select for proportionally higher numbers of resistant whiteflies and perhaps reduced control in cotton fields. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | AZ1224 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Series P-125 | en_US |
dc.subject | Agriculture -- Arizona | en_US |
dc.subject | Cotton -- Arizona | en_US |
dc.subject | Cotton -- Insect investigations | en_US |
dc.title | Relative Susceptibility of Whiteflies to Danital® + Orthone® Over a 5-year Period | en_US |
dc.type | text | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | USDA-ARS Western Cotton Research Laboratory, Phoenix | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | The University of Arizona, Department of Entomology & Maricopa Agricultural Center | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | University of California, Riverside, Department of Entomology | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-26T03:20:25Z | |
html.description.abstract | As part of a program to assess differences in susceptibility to insecticides among regional populations of Bemisia tabaci, insecticide resistance monitoring was carried out at the Maricopa Agricultural Center from fall, 1995 through 1999. Monitoring efforts were concentrated on Danitol®+Orthene® following reports of control problems and documentation of resistance to this mixture in 1995. We were interested in the longer-term dynamics of resistance in light of radically altered treatment regimens beginning with the use of IGRs in 1996. Although the frequency of susceptible individuals to Danitol+Orthene tended to increase in the later years, highly resistant individuals were still present 5 years after the resistance episode of 1995. Whitefly adults collected from various insecticide treatment plots other than Danitol+Orthene were generally uniform in their responses from the time of initial whitefly infestation until defoliation. However, a dramatic shift in susceptibility occurred following a single application of Danitol+Orthene in 1997 and 1999. The increased frequency of resistant individuals following treatment suggests that any large scale return to the use of Danitol+Orthene could rapidly select for proportionally higher numbers of resistant whiteflies and perhaps reduced control in cotton fields. |