Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHusman, Stephen H.
dc.contributor.authorGarrot, Donald J. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorFangmeier, Delmar D.
dc.contributor.authorOebker, Norman F.
dc.contributor.editorOebker, Norman F.en_US
dc.contributor.editorBantlin, Margueriteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-06T21:39:51Z
dc.date.available2012-03-06T21:39:51Z
dc.date.issued1990-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/214474
dc.description.abstractThe Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) was used to schedule irrigations on Jubilee sweet corn on 12 drip- irrigated plots at the Campus Agricultural Center in Tucson. Irrigations were to be scheduled at 0.15, 0.35, and 0.50 CWSI values to represent a wet, medium and a dry treatment. Actual average CWSI values at time of irrigation were for 0.14, 0.36, and 0.48. There were no significant yield or quality differences for the wet and medium treatments with exception of a greater ear diameter in the wet treatment. Yield and quality significantly decreased for the dry treatment scheduled at a CWSI value of 0.48. Irrigation application totals were 26.4, 24.2 and 18.3 inches for the wet, medium and dry treatments respectively.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-82en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370082en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectVegetables -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCorn -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCorn -- Irrigationen_US
dc.titleSweet Corn Irrigation Scheduling Using Infrared Thermometers and the Crop Water Stress Indexen_US
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalVegetable Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-04-25T18:07:59Z
html.description.abstractThe Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) was used to schedule irrigations on Jubilee sweet corn on 12 drip- irrigated plots at the Campus Agricultural Center in Tucson. Irrigations were to be scheduled at 0.15, 0.35, and 0.50 CWSI values to represent a wet, medium and a dry treatment. Actual average CWSI values at time of irrigation were for 0.14, 0.36, and 0.48. There were no significant yield or quality differences for the wet and medium treatments with exception of a greater ear diameter in the wet treatment. Yield and quality significantly decreased for the dry treatment scheduled at a CWSI value of 0.48. Irrigation application totals were 26.4, 24.2 and 18.3 inches for the wet, medium and dry treatments respectively.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370082-024-028.pdf
Size:
64.95Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record