Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorByrne, David N.
dc.contributor.authorBlackmer, Jackie
dc.contributor.authorRathman, Robin
dc.contributor.editorOebker, Norman F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-07T21:26:40Z
dc.date.available2012-03-07T21:26:40Z
dc.date.issued1994-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/214731
dc.description.abstractAlthough problems associated with the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), are not as dramatic as they were in 1992. they were still significant in 1993. Laboratory research in 1993 focused on defining the cues that result in migratory behavior, specifically host quality. In addition, field studies were conducted to learn more about timing, direction, and distance flown. Our goal is to develop a predictive model that can be used for forecasting whitefly movement. During our behavioral studies, B. tabaci was presented with two cues that lead to disparate behaviors. More than 70% of the whiteflies we tested ended their flights (within three presentations of the cue) when given a choice between settling on a 'host' (550 nm interference filter) and continued flight. Only 6% of the individuals we tested, demonstrated what would be considered to be true migration Both endogenoous and exogenous factors can play an important role in determining when insects will fly. Finally, although the oogenesis-flight syndrome is thought to be a strong component of insect migratory activity, whiteflies do not appear to postpone egg production until after they have engaged in flight. In the field marked whiteflies were also collected in the most distant of these traps. These field results support our hypothesis that most whitefly movement in the fall in the Yuma Valley is in a SW direction (prevailing winds are from the NE). Within a 3 hr time frame whiteflies can travel as far as 2.2 miles from the source field. We examined the effects of female flight distance and eggload. We found significant differences in the eggload of field collected whiteflies versus whiteflies collected in traps at all distances from the source field. There was no relationship between distance flown and eggload. These results may indicate that dispersing individuals are capable of delaying egg laying until a suitable host plant is located
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370097en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-97en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectVegetables -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectSweet potato -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectSweet potato -- Insect controlen_US
dc.titleField and Laboratory Evaluation of Migration and Dispersal by the Sweet Potato Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)en_US
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalVegetable Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-26T06:33:50Z
html.description.abstractAlthough problems associated with the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), are not as dramatic as they were in 1992. they were still significant in 1993. Laboratory research in 1993 focused on defining the cues that result in migratory behavior, specifically host quality. In addition, field studies were conducted to learn more about timing, direction, and distance flown. Our goal is to develop a predictive model that can be used for forecasting whitefly movement. During our behavioral studies, B. tabaci was presented with two cues that lead to disparate behaviors. More than 70% of the whiteflies we tested ended their flights (within three presentations of the cue) when given a choice between settling on a 'host' (550 nm interference filter) and continued flight. Only 6% of the individuals we tested, demonstrated what would be considered to be true migration Both endogenoous and exogenous factors can play an important role in determining when insects will fly. Finally, although the oogenesis-flight syndrome is thought to be a strong component of insect migratory activity, whiteflies do not appear to postpone egg production until after they have engaged in flight. In the field marked whiteflies were also collected in the most distant of these traps. These field results support our hypothesis that most whitefly movement in the fall in the Yuma Valley is in a SW direction (prevailing winds are from the NE). Within a 3 hr time frame whiteflies can travel as far as 2.2 miles from the source field. We examined the effects of female flight distance and eggload. We found significant differences in the eggload of field collected whiteflies versus whiteflies collected in traps at all distances from the source field. There was no relationship between distance flown and eggload. These results may indicate that dispersing individuals are capable of delaying egg laying until a suitable host plant is located


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370097-069-076.pdf
Size:
288.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record