Neonicotinoids and Azadirachtin in Lettuce: Comparison of Application Methods for Control of Lettuce Aphids
| dc.contributor.author | Palumbo, John C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Reyes, F. J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mullis, C. H. Jr. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amaya, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ledesma, L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carey, L. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Byrne, David N. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | Baciewicz, Patti | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-08T18:37:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-08T18:37:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2001-08 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/214930 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Several small-plot field studies were conducted at the University of Arizona, Yuma Agricultural Center in the spring 2001 growing season to evaluate various neonicotinoids and azadirachtin products against lettuce aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri, in lettuce. Further, these products were compared as soil-applied treatments, foliar sprays and application through sub-surface irrigation. The results of these trials provide useful information for understanding how to effectively use the new chemistries available for aphid management in lettuce. First, Platinum performed best as a post-planting application through a side-dress application or through the drip. The foliar neonicotinoids, Assail and Actara were active against lettuce aphids, but were most effective when populations densities were lower. Comparatively, the conventional chemistries (MSR, Orthene/Provado, Provado/Endosulfan) provided consistent control when used aggressively. The azadirachtin products were significantly less effective against LA in head lettuce due largely to their inability to contact the insects, but on formulation (AzaDirect) showed better efficacy when applied through drip irrigation or sprayed repeatedly in romaine lettuce. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | AZ1252 | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Series P-127 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Agriculture -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Vegetables -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Vegetables -- Insects | en_US |
| dc.title | Neonicotinoids and Azadirachtin in Lettuce: Comparison of Application Methods for Control of Lettuce Aphids | en_US |
| dc.type | text | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Entomology, Yuma Valley Agricultural Center | en_US |
| dc.identifier.journal | Vegetable Report | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-04T16:02:44Z | |
| html.description.abstract | Several small-plot field studies were conducted at the University of Arizona, Yuma Agricultural Center in the spring 2001 growing season to evaluate various neonicotinoids and azadirachtin products against lettuce aphid, Nasonovia ribisnigri, in lettuce. Further, these products were compared as soil-applied treatments, foliar sprays and application through sub-surface irrigation. The results of these trials provide useful information for understanding how to effectively use the new chemistries available for aphid management in lettuce. First, Platinum performed best as a post-planting application through a side-dress application or through the drip. The foliar neonicotinoids, Assail and Actara were active against lettuce aphids, but were most effective when populations densities were lower. Comparatively, the conventional chemistries (MSR, Orthene/Provado, Provado/Endosulfan) provided consistent control when used aggressively. The azadirachtin products were significantly less effective against LA in head lettuce due largely to their inability to contact the insects, but on formulation (AzaDirect) showed better efficacy when applied through drip irrigation or sprayed repeatedly in romaine lettuce. |
