Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKopec, David M.
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Jeffrey J.
dc.contributor.editorKopec, David M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-22T19:38:05Z
dc.date.available2012-03-22T19:38:05Z
dc.date.issued2001-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/216356
dc.description.abstractSulfentrazone was applied to perennial ryegrass turf as single applications at 0.125, 0.250 and 0.375 lb. AI/A, and split application combinations of 0.125/0.125, 0.250/0.250 and 0.375/0.125 AI/A. Respective treatments were applied on June 28 and July 31, 1996. Sulfentrazone caused a decrease in turfgrass color, which was most noticeable at the 0.375 lb. AI/A rate. Decreases in color were generally dependent on application rate. Sulfentrazone caused a slight "pocking" of the turf, which resulted from leaf twisting/cupping. This injury was most evident at seven days after the first application. There was no foliar burning or uneven discoloration however. The turf exhibited a lesser amount of discoloration and injury following the second (split) application.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-126en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAZ1246en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectTurfgrasses -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectTurf management -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectPlants, ornamental -- Arizonaen_US
dc.titleResponse of Perennial Ryegrass under Desert Conditions to Applications of Sulfentrazone Herbicideen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalTurfgrass, Landscape and Urban IPM Research Summaryen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-20T07:57:57Z
html.description.abstractSulfentrazone was applied to perennial ryegrass turf as single applications at 0.125, 0.250 and 0.375 lb. AI/A, and split application combinations of 0.125/0.125, 0.250/0.250 and 0.375/0.125 AI/A. Respective treatments were applied on June 28 and July 31, 1996. Sulfentrazone caused a decrease in turfgrass color, which was most noticeable at the 0.375 lb. AI/A rate. Decreases in color were generally dependent on application rate. Sulfentrazone caused a slight "pocking" of the turf, which resulted from leaf twisting/cupping. This injury was most evident at seven days after the first application. There was no foliar burning or uneven discoloration however. The turf exhibited a lesser amount of discoloration and injury following the second (split) application.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
az12463c3-2001.pdf
Size:
36.58Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record