Current Status of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review of Non-orthodox Deployment Strategies
| dc.contributor.author | Pan, Hao | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-01T14:53:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-05-01T14:53:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-05-01 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/221384 | |
| dc.description | A Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | points included feasibility, safety, efficacy, and durability. Results: The current literature regarding TAVI is limited to observational studies. Overall procedural success rates ranged from 90% to 100%. The incidence of major adverse events included: 30-day mortality (0%-18%), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events ranged from 2% to 35% and the rate of postoperative multiple organ failure was 2% to 8%. There was statistically significant hemodynamic improvement demonstrated by postoperative echocardiography measurements with no significant deterioration up to 6 months postprocedure. Survival at 6 months ranged from 59% to 93%. Only 5 one study with long-term of transapical TAVI follow-up could reliably evaluate long-term survival of 58% at 3 years. Significance: TAVI has proven to be feasible and potentially an effective intervention for non-surgical patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Although short-term efficacy based on echocardiography has been promising, there is a paucity of data concerning long-term outcomes. The evolution of TAVI will be dependent on the development of a valid tool for estimating the surgical risk to define indications for surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
| dc.publisher | The University of Arizona. | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the College of Medicine - Phoenix, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Implantation | en |
| dc.subject | Transcatheter | en |
| dc.subject.mesh | Aortic Valve | en |
| dc.title | Current Status of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review of Non-orthodox Deployment Strategies | en_US |
| dc.type | text; Electronic Thesis | en |
| dc.contributor.department | The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix | en |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | This item is part of the College of Medicine - Phoenix Scholarly Projects 2012 collection. For more information, contact the Phoenix Biomedical Campus Library at pbc-library@email.arizona.edu. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.mentor | Caskey, Michael | en |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-25T16:15:01Z | |
| html.description.abstract | points included feasibility, safety, efficacy, and durability. Results: The current literature regarding TAVI is limited to observational studies. Overall procedural success rates ranged from 90% to 100%. The incidence of major adverse events included: 30-day mortality (0%-18%), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events ranged from 2% to 35% and the rate of postoperative multiple organ failure was 2% to 8%. There was statistically significant hemodynamic improvement demonstrated by postoperative echocardiography measurements with no significant deterioration up to 6 months postprocedure. Survival at 6 months ranged from 59% to 93%. Only 5 one study with long-term of transapical TAVI follow-up could reliably evaluate long-term survival of 58% at 3 years. Significance: TAVI has proven to be feasible and potentially an effective intervention for non-surgical patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Although short-term efficacy based on echocardiography has been promising, there is a paucity of data concerning long-term outcomes. The evolution of TAVI will be dependent on the development of a valid tool for estimating the surgical risk to define indications for surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation. |

