Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGibson, Richard
dc.contributor.authorNunan, Linda
dc.contributor.authorKilby, Michael
dc.contributor.editorWright, Glennen_US
dc.contributor.editorKilby, Mikeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-08T18:21:51Z
dc.date.available2012-05-08T18:21:51Z
dc.date.issued1999-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/222534
dc.description.abstractMature pecan trees at Picacho, Arizona were evaluated for variety performance during 1997-98. Total average yield per tree, percent kernel and percent viviparity were observed. During 1997, a severe viviparity year, only Bradley, Cheyenne, Souix and Tejas showed viviparity values of 20% or lower. Tejas did not return an acceptable percent kernel leaving Bradley, Cheyenne and Souix as potential varieties able to withstand low desert growing conditions on a regular basis. In 1998, the cool growing season confounded the test and no conclusions were drawn from the data.
dc.description.sponsorshipArizona Citrus Research Councilen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAZ1138en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-117en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCitrus fruits -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectPecan -- Arizonaen_US
dc.titlePerformance of mature pecan varieties in the low desert 1997 and 1998en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCitrus and Deciduous Fruit and Nut Research Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-26T14:29:58Z
html.description.abstractMature pecan trees at Picacho, Arizona were evaluated for variety performance during 1997-98. Total average yield per tree, percent kernel and percent viviparity were observed. During 1997, a severe viviparity year, only Bradley, Cheyenne, Souix and Tejas showed viviparity values of 20% or lower. Tejas did not return an acceptable percent kernel leaving Bradley, Cheyenne and Souix as potential varieties able to withstand low desert growing conditions on a regular basis. In 1998, the cool growing season confounded the test and no conclusions were drawn from the data.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
az1138_10-1999.pdf
Size:
16.07Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record