Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKerns, David L.
dc.contributor.authorTellez, Tony
dc.contributor.editorWright, Glennen_US
dc.contributor.editorKilby, Mikeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-15T16:58:11Z
dc.date.available2012-05-15T16:58:11Z
dc.date.issued2000-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/223851
dc.description.abstractUnder low citrus thrips pressure and cool temperatures, Alert, Baythroid, Carzol, Success and Acetamiprid applied at petal fall were all effective control agents. Mid-season applications of Baythroid and Danitol were also effective but appeared to be slightly inferior to Success and Alert in residual control. Despite the prolonged blooming and petal drop period experienced during this trial, plots receiving pre-petal fall applications of Acetamiprid did not produce higher quality fruit than treatments where applications began following petal fall. The fact that thrips densities were low during this period may be the reason. Before pre-petal fall insecticide applications can be deemed useful and economically justifiable, evaluations must be made at higher thrips infestation levels.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAZ1178en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-123en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCitrus fruits -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCitrus -- Insectsen_US
dc.titleInsecticide Rotation and Pre-Petal Fall Applications for Citrus Thrips Managementen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCitrus and Deciduous Fruit and Nut Research Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-04-25T22:21:51Z
html.description.abstractUnder low citrus thrips pressure and cool temperatures, Alert, Baythroid, Carzol, Success and Acetamiprid applied at petal fall were all effective control agents. Mid-season applications of Baythroid and Danitol were also effective but appeared to be slightly inferior to Success and Alert in residual control. Despite the prolonged blooming and petal drop period experienced during this trial, plots receiving pre-petal fall applications of Acetamiprid did not produce higher quality fruit than treatments where applications began following petal fall. The fact that thrips densities were low during this period may be the reason. Before pre-petal fall insecticide applications can be deemed useful and economically justifiable, evaluations must be made at higher thrips infestation levels.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
az1178_1-2000.pdf
Size:
28.11Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record