Tank Mixing Success for Citrus Thrips Control is Not Necessary
dc.contributor.author | Kerns, David L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tellez, Tony | |
dc.contributor.editor | Wright, Glenn | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Kilby, Mike | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-15T17:01:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-15T17:01:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2000-10 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/223853 | |
dc.description.abstract | A small plot efficacy trial was conducted evaluating thrips control with Dimethoate, Baythroid, and Success at rates of 4, 6, and 9 oz/ac, and tank mixes of the low and medium rates of Success with Dimethoate or Baythroid. Based on a 10% fruit infestation threshold, Dimethoate required three applications while the other treatments required two applications to achieve season long thrips control. However, when evaluating the treatments based on a cost effectiveness index, none of the tank mixes or Success at 9 oz./ac were economically advisable. The most cost effective treatment was Success at 4 oz/ac, followed by Success at 6 oz/ac, Dimethoate, and Baythroid. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | AZ1178 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Series P-123 | en_US |
dc.subject | Agriculture -- Arizona | en_US |
dc.subject | Citrus fruits -- Arizona | en_US |
dc.subject | Citrus -- Insects | en_US |
dc.title | Tank Mixing Success for Citrus Thrips Control is Not Necessary | en_US |
dc.type | text | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Citrus and Deciduous Fruit and Nut Research Report | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-26T15:21:47Z | |
html.description.abstract | A small plot efficacy trial was conducted evaluating thrips control with Dimethoate, Baythroid, and Success at rates of 4, 6, and 9 oz/ac, and tank mixes of the low and medium rates of Success with Dimethoate or Baythroid. Based on a 10% fruit infestation threshold, Dimethoate required three applications while the other treatments required two applications to achieve season long thrips control. However, when evaluating the treatments based on a cost effectiveness index, none of the tank mixes or Success at 9 oz./ac were economically advisable. The most cost effective treatment was Success at 4 oz/ac, followed by Success at 6 oz/ac, Dimethoate, and Baythroid. |