Comments on Interpretation on Climatic Information from Tree Rings, Eastern North America
| dc.contributor.author | Phipps, Richard L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-12T21:43:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-12-12T21:43:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1982 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Phipps, R.L. 1982. Comments on interpretation of climatic information from tree rings, eastern North America. Tree-Ring Bulletin 42:11-22. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0041-2198 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/261100 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A general discussion regarding problems inherent to developing climatically sensitive tree-ring chronologies from eastern North America is presented. Tree-ring collections from eastern forests are typically not as climatically sensitive as western collections. Collections have been made from a diversity of sites, but it seems that collections from wet sites or sites of extremely shallow soils may have limited potential. The detrimental effect of crown crowding on sensitivity suggests preference be given to shade-tolerant species and to trees with less crowded crowns exposed in the canopy. Nonclimatic trends in tree-ring data are classified as growth trends and competition trends. Standardization of ring widths removes much of the growth trends, and merging individual tree chronologies into a mean collection chronology eliminates much of the competition trends of individual trees. Separation of ring width into earlywood and latewood widths, where possible, may be quite beneficial for non-pored and diffuse-porous species. However, this procedure seems to be of little value for ring-porous species. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Tree-Ring Society | en_US |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.treeringsociety.org | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright © Tree-Ring Society. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dendrochronology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Tree Rings | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dendroclimatology | en_US |
| dc.title | Comments on Interpretation on Climatic Information from Tree Rings, Eastern North America | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA | en_US |
| dc.identifier.journal | Tree-Ring Bulletin | en_US |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | This item is part of the Tree-Ring Research (formerly Tree-Ring Bulletin) archive. It was digitized from a physical copy provided by the Laboratory of Tree-Ring research at The University of Arizona. For more information about this peer-reviewed scholarly journal, please email the Editor of Tree-Ring Research at editor@treeringsociety.org. | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-16T18:41:39Z | |
| html.description.abstract | A general discussion regarding problems inherent to developing climatically sensitive tree-ring chronologies from eastern North America is presented. Tree-ring collections from eastern forests are typically not as climatically sensitive as western collections. Collections have been made from a diversity of sites, but it seems that collections from wet sites or sites of extremely shallow soils may have limited potential. The detrimental effect of crown crowding on sensitivity suggests preference be given to shade-tolerant species and to trees with less crowded crowns exposed in the canopy. Nonclimatic trends in tree-ring data are classified as growth trends and competition trends. Standardization of ring widths removes much of the growth trends, and merging individual tree chronologies into a mean collection chronology eliminates much of the competition trends of individual trees. Separation of ring width into earlywood and latewood widths, where possible, may be quite beneficial for non-pored and diffuse-porous species. However, this procedure seems to be of little value for ring-porous species. |
