The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMonke, Eric A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArgwings-Kodhek, Clement Gem, 1963-
dc.creatorArgwings-Kodhek, Clement Gem, 1963-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-28T10:17:29Z
dc.date.available2013-03-28T10:17:29Z
dc.date.issued1988en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/276789
dc.description.abstractThe Agricultural Marketing Agreements Act of 1937 allows groups of specialty crop producers to form marketing orders to affect various aspects of the market in which they sell. Two of the three major tree nuts--almonds and walnuts--operate under marketing orders. This study examined the question of whether or not the third major tree nut industry--pecans--should follow suit. An econometric model of the demand side of the tree nut industries was developed and used in simulations to see how prices and total revenues in the pecan industry would change under different assumptions as to the existence, or form, of a marketing order. The results showed that over the simulation period--1988 to 1992--the industry would benefit from the formation of a marketing order that limited quantities reaching the primary market, and used the surplus for developing new markets.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectPecan industry -- Economic aspects.en_US
dc.subjectPecan -- Marketing.en_US
dc.titleAn economic analysis of the desirability of another tree nut marketing order: Pecansen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeThesis-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.oclc21325911en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.identifier.proquest1334343en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineAgricultural Economicsen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b17214129en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b17214117en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-19T14:50:11Z
html.description.abstractThe Agricultural Marketing Agreements Act of 1937 allows groups of specialty crop producers to form marketing orders to affect various aspects of the market in which they sell. Two of the three major tree nuts--almonds and walnuts--operate under marketing orders. This study examined the question of whether or not the third major tree nut industry--pecans--should follow suit. An econometric model of the demand side of the tree nut industries was developed and used in simulations to see how prices and total revenues in the pecan industry would change under different assumptions as to the existence, or form, of a marketing order. The results showed that over the simulation period--1988 to 1992--the industry would benefit from the formation of a marketing order that limited quantities reaching the primary market, and used the surplus for developing new markets.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_1334343_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
2.926Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record