The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
The role of congressional control in the adjudication of Indian claims in the United States Court of Claims
| dc.contributor.advisor | Williams, Robert A. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Geldreich, Adam Arnold, 1954- | |
| dc.creator | Geldreich, Adam Arnold, 1954- | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-03T13:15:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-04-03T13:15:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1992 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/278190 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Indian Claims in the United States Court of Claims possess the unique quality of close congressional scrutiny. Because of the long-standing legislative relationship existing between the legislative branch and Indian tribal groups, the experiences of tribes in the Court of Claims held particular dynamics which were exclusively distinctive in many ways. It is my hypothesis that congressional plenary power over Indian tribes and the influential legislative control which Congress exercised over the Court of Claims combined to put Indians in a litigatory environment which doomed the possibility for the majority of tribes to achieve successful redress of grievances. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The University of Arizona. | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. | en_US |
| dc.subject | History, United States. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Law. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies. | en_US |
| dc.title | The role of congressional control in the adjudication of Indian claims in the United States Court of Claims | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) | en_US |
| thesis.degree.grantor | University of Arizona | en_US |
| thesis.degree.level | masters | en_US |
| dc.identifier.proquest | 1349479 | en_US |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Graduate College | en_US |
| thesis.degree.name | M.A. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.bibrecord | .b27702443 | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-27T13:31:59Z | |
| html.description.abstract | Indian Claims in the United States Court of Claims possess the unique quality of close congressional scrutiny. Because of the long-standing legislative relationship existing between the legislative branch and Indian tribal groups, the experiences of tribes in the Court of Claims held particular dynamics which were exclusively distinctive in many ways. It is my hypothesis that congressional plenary power over Indian tribes and the influential legislative control which Congress exercised over the Court of Claims combined to put Indians in a litigatory environment which doomed the possibility for the majority of tribes to achieve successful redress of grievances. |
