Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJackson, Sallyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMassey, Joseph Eric, 1964-
dc.creatorMassey, Joseph Eric, 1964-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-03T13:18:38Z
dc.date.available2013-04-03T13:18:38Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/278263
dc.description.abstractBurgoon and colleagues have applied Expectancy Theory to the study of language intensity, arguing that a complex pattern of effects can be explained in terms of the expectations people hold for sources of persuasive communication. It is argued in this paper, however, that because expectations have not been directly examined, Expectancy Theory has not provided a fair test of hypotheses. The current investigation aims to alleviate this problem by determining whether expectations people have for male and female sources of persuasive communication do in fact differ. Using a variety of message topics, expectations for male and female sources were investigated by asking respondents to provide the language choices they thought would be most effective for male and female authors of persuasive communication. What the results suggest is that both men and women should utilize moderate to high intense language to be optimally effective in suasory attempts.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectSpeech Communication.en_US
dc.titleAn empirical test of the relationship between expectations, language intensity, and genderen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeThesis-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.identifier.proquest1351351en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.A.en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b27148415en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-19T04:32:09Z
html.description.abstractBurgoon and colleagues have applied Expectancy Theory to the study of language intensity, arguing that a complex pattern of effects can be explained in terms of the expectations people hold for sources of persuasive communication. It is argued in this paper, however, that because expectations have not been directly examined, Expectancy Theory has not provided a fair test of hypotheses. The current investigation aims to alleviate this problem by determining whether expectations people have for male and female sources of persuasive communication do in fact differ. Using a variety of message topics, expectations for male and female sources were investigated by asking respondents to provide the language choices they thought would be most effective for male and female authors of persuasive communication. What the results suggest is that both men and women should utilize moderate to high intense language to be optimally effective in suasory attempts.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_1351351_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
2.962Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record