Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJones, Elaine G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKane, Maureen Frances, 1953-
dc.creatorKane, Maureen Frances, 1953-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-03T13:24:40Z
dc.date.available2013-04-03T13:24:40Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/278441
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness and efficiency of two postpartum assessment tools: an empirically based postpartum assessment tool and the theory-based Roy-postpartum adaptation assessment tool (R-PAAT). Thirty mother-infant pairs were sequentially assigned to the control or experimental group for a postpartum home visit. Secondary analysis of the data involved (1) identification of nursing diagnoses generated from each assessment tool's data, (2) comparison of the number of nursing diagnoses generated using the empiric postpartum assessment tool versus the R-PAAT, and (3) comparison of the efficiency, measured by time required for a home visit, using the respective tools. Two of the 18 possible postpartum nursing diagnoses were identified significantly (p < .05) more often using the R-PAAT and two additional diagnoses approached significance. Home visits using the R-PAAT required significantly longer time to complete.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Nursing.en_US
dc.titleClinical usefulness and efficiency of two postpartum home visit assessment toolsen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeThesis-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.identifier.proquest1358524en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineNursingen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b32086672en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-17T22:39:21Z
html.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness and efficiency of two postpartum assessment tools: an empirically based postpartum assessment tool and the theory-based Roy-postpartum adaptation assessment tool (R-PAAT). Thirty mother-infant pairs were sequentially assigned to the control or experimental group for a postpartum home visit. Secondary analysis of the data involved (1) identification of nursing diagnoses generated from each assessment tool's data, (2) comparison of the number of nursing diagnoses generated using the empiric postpartum assessment tool versus the R-PAAT, and (3) comparison of the efficiency, measured by time required for a home visit, using the respective tools. Two of the 18 possible postpartum nursing diagnoses were identified significantly (p < .05) more often using the R-PAAT and two additional diagnoses approached significance. Home visits using the R-PAAT required significantly longer time to complete.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_1358524_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
3.488Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record