Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWilliams, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Howard James
dc.creatorHayes, Howard Jamesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-03T13:29:58Z
dc.date.available2013-04-03T13:29:58Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/278587
dc.description.abstractThe question this thesis asks is: How have non-Indian conceptions of masculinity and femininity shaped federal Indian policy during the late nineteenth-century? The answer to this question lies, I will argue, in the process of liberal state formation itself; a process which necessarily involves the continued reproduction of gender hierarchies and systems of male power that privilege men and masculinity over women and femininity. This public/private dichotomy, and the system of gender relations it supports, restricts women's social role to within a highly circumscribed private sphere separate and distinct from the public sphere of economy and state occupied by men. Therefore, as a reflection of the overall process of liberal state formation, the process of incorporating Indian peoples into the American social, economic, and political mainstream undertaken during the assimilation and allotment eras, necessarily entailed the reproduction of Euroamerican gender hierarchies within Indian societies.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectHistory, United States.en_US
dc.subjectWomen's Studies.en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, Public Administration.en_US
dc.subjectSociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies.en_US
dc.titleIndian women, domesticity, and liberal state formation: The gendered dimension of Indian policy reform during the assimilation and allotment erasen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeThesis-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.identifier.proquest1384550en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineAmerican Indian Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.A.en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b34775614en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-20T03:05:47Z
html.description.abstractThe question this thesis asks is: How have non-Indian conceptions of masculinity and femininity shaped federal Indian policy during the late nineteenth-century? The answer to this question lies, I will argue, in the process of liberal state formation itself; a process which necessarily involves the continued reproduction of gender hierarchies and systems of male power that privilege men and masculinity over women and femininity. This public/private dichotomy, and the system of gender relations it supports, restricts women's social role to within a highly circumscribed private sphere separate and distinct from the public sphere of economy and state occupied by men. Therefore, as a reflection of the overall process of liberal state formation, the process of incorporating Indian peoples into the American social, economic, and political mainstream undertaken during the assimilation and allotment eras, necessarily entailed the reproduction of Euroamerican gender hierarchies within Indian societies.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_1384550_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
1.877Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record