• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Explication and testing of the structural component of the transtheoretical integration model

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_td_3073196_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    3.706Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Brewer, Barbara Bagdasarian
    Issue Date
    2002
    Keywords
    Sociology, Theory and Methods.
    Health Sciences, Nursing.
    Advisor
    Verran, Joyce A.
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    The purpose of this research was to develop and empirically test the structural component of the Transtheoretical Integration Model (TIM). TIM contains four stages, environment, sociotechnical system, integration, and goals, and uses a systems perspective to propose constructs and relationships congruent with team-based contexts in acute care environments. The framework extends previous work by reconceptualizing patient care unit structures consistent with current environments. The sample consisted of 16 medical surgical units drawn from four hospitals in the Southwestern United States. Participants included 411 multidisciplinary team members employed on the sampled units. The majority of participants were registered nurses and unlicensed care personnel. Measures used in this research were adapted from instruments previously used in non-acute care settings. Data were collected through self-report and hospital administrative databases. Psychometric properties of all but three scales (Hierarchical Culture, Rational Culture, and Task Type) exhibited evidence of validity as group measures. TIM proposed that Workgroup Design moderated by Group and Developmental Cultures would lead to Positive Intra-Team Process and Negative Intra-Team Process, which in turn would lead to effective patient outcomes (decreased Falls with Injury) and efficient organizational outcomes (lower Costs and shorter Lengths of Stay). TIM further proposed that Work Technology moderated the relationship between the two Intra-Team Process constructs and Outcome variables. Neither moderator entered the model, but Group and Developmental Culture directly predicted a reduction in Falls (Group Culture) and increased Costs (Developmental Culture). Workgroup Design predicted Positive and Negative Intra-Team Process, which predicted increased Length of Stay. Neither mediator variable predicted Patient Falls or Costs. Based on these preliminary findings, multidisciplinary teams did not have any effect on reducing Patient Falls or lowering Costs. Negative Intra-Team Process did predict increased Length of Stay, as did Positive Intra-Team Process. Workgroup Design indirectly predicted increased Length of Stay through its relationship with Positive Intra-Team Process and Negative Intra-Team Process. Further research should evaluate the influence of TIM's environment stage on other model stages and evaluate the stability of these findings in a larger sample.
    Type
    text
    Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Nursing
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.