• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Flowerpiercers and hummingbirds: A comparative study of nectar feeding strategies in birds

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_td_3090016_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    3.272Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Schondube-Friedewold, Jorge
    Issue Date
    2003
    Keywords
    Biology, Ecology.
    Biology, Animal Physiology.
    Biology, Zoology.
    Advisor
    Martinez del Rio, Carlos
    Bronstein, Judith L.
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    Nectarivory has evolved independently eight times among birds. In the neotropics specialized nectarivory evolved in hummingbirds and flowerpiercers (genus Diglossa). Flowerpiercers are nectar-robbers of hummingbird-pollinated plants. Because flowerpiercers and hummingbirds are found in the same habitats feeding on the nectar of the same flowers, they provide us with a unique opportunity to understand the pressures that nectarivory imposes on animals. Flowerpiercers present beaks that have a long hook at the tip of their maxilla. The hook is used to hold tubular flowers in place while they stab them by projecting their lower mandible. Then, they insert their tongues in the puncture and extract nectar. I investigated the following questions: (1) What is the function of the flowerpiercer's hook, and which are the consequences of its evolution? (2) Are the digestive traits of flowerpiercers convergent with those of hummingbirds? (3) How do digestive traits affect sugar selection by nectar feeding birds? And (4) What are the effects of Diglossa baritula's physiology and behavior over its annual cycles? I found that nectarivorous flowerpiercers evolved from a frugivorous ancestor with a hookless beak. The evolution of a hooked bill allowed flowerpiercers to become efficient nectar-robers, but hindered their efficiency to feed on fruit. Using a phylogenetically informed approach, I found that the digestive traits of flowerpiercers and hummingbirds are not convergent. Unlike hummingbirds which have astounding intestinal sucrase activity levels, flowerpiercers had low sucrase activity. Nectar intake in D. baritula seems to be limited by its ability to digest sucrose. I also found that sugar preferences in nectar-feeding birds are concentration-dependent. At lower concentrations birds preferred hexoses, whereas at higher concentrations they preferred sucrose. Although nectar composition and concentration are often discussed as two different floral traits, they have a synergistic effect on the sugar preferences of nectar-feeding birds. D. baritula individuals exhibit biannual reproductive and molting cycles that are synchronized with flower and fruit abundance in the mountains of Mexico. The ability to rob nectar appears to have molded the evolution of the most important morphological, physiological and behavioral traits of D. baritula.
    Type
    text
    Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.