Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMulligan, Gordon F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Yool, 1959-
dc.creatorLee, Sang Yool, 1959-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-18T09:37:46Z
dc.date.available2013-04-18T09:37:46Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/282254
dc.description.abstractIn spite of the descriptive merit of traditional von Thunen model for agricultural land use patterns, the model's sole emphasis on the production side of the economy has not provided a realistic picture of land use and agricultural markets. By reexamining the production-oriented model, it can be shown that parameters in the model are not independent of each other. In order to incorporate the economic mechanism of agricultural markets, a closed version of the von Thunen model is proposed for a three-activity, two-dimensional economy, and equilibrium solutions are generated for prices, land areas, and outputs. The comparison of the two versions of the von Thunen model illustrates an over prediction of land use change in the production-oriented model. The closed model further includes environmental factors for an integrative perspective in agricultural location theory. This approach is extended to consider farmers' decision-making under environmental uncertainty. Farmers' decision-making, reflecting contrasting attitudes towards environmental uncertainty, is developed in three different models, both on the production side and in a closed economy. These are the maximum-expected return model, the guaranteed return model, and the behavioral model. With respect to the production side of the economy, land use is highly subject to climatic variability and crop competition, whereas price variability and stable land use result from the closed economy.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectGeography.en_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Agricultural.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Agricultural.en_US
dc.titleAgricultural location theory and behaviors in market based on von Thunen's modelen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.identifier.proquest9720656en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGeography and Regional Developmenten_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
dc.description.noteThis item was digitized from a paper original and/or a microfilm copy. If you need higher-resolution images for any content in this item, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b34571966en_US
dc.description.admin-noteOriginal file replaced with corrected file October 2023.
refterms.dateFOA2018-04-12T11:51:42Z
html.description.abstractIn spite of the descriptive merit of traditional von Thunen model for agricultural land use patterns, the model's sole emphasis on the production side of the economy has not provided a realistic picture of land use and agricultural markets. By reexamining the production-oriented model, it can be shown that parameters in the model are not independent of each other. In order to incorporate the economic mechanism of agricultural markets, a closed version of the von Thunen model is proposed for a three-activity, two-dimensional economy, and equilibrium solutions are generated for prices, land areas, and outputs. The comparison of the two versions of the von Thunen model illustrates an over prediction of land use change in the production-oriented model. The closed model further includes environmental factors for an integrative perspective in agricultural location theory. This approach is extended to consider farmers' decision-making under environmental uncertainty. Farmers' decision-making, reflecting contrasting attitudes towards environmental uncertainty, is developed in three different models, both on the production side and in a closed economy. These are the maximum-expected return model, the guaranteed return model, and the behavioral model. With respect to the production side of the economy, land use is highly subject to climatic variability and crop competition, whereas price variability and stable land use result from the closed economy.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_9720656_sip1_c.pdf
Size:
4.971Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record