"The Refutation of the Grammarians" by Ibn Mada' al-Qurtubi: A translation, with syntactic analysis of "Bab al-Ishtighal"
| dc.contributor.advisor | Gamal, Adel S. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Philip Alan, 1958- | |
| dc.creator | Johnson, Philip Alan, 1958- | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-18T09:56:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-04-18T09:56:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1998 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/282645 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Government and Binding Theory dictates that the case features of noun phrases are assigned structurally under government. On this basis the claim by Ibn Mada'al-Qurtubi, in The Refutation of the Grammarians, that case is assigned solely by the language user on strictly semantic grounds, is rejected; also untenable, however, is the position of traditional Arab grammarians that case can, in some contexts, be assigned by "concealed" governors, as the Projection and Structure-Preserving Principles require that material having semantic content be visible at all levels of representation. Government and Binding principles are adequate to account for case-assignment in the issues raised by Ibn Mada'; they cannot, however, offer a clear solution to the apparent violation of Principle C of the Binding Theory found in some examples of bab al-tanazuᶜ, the category of "contention in government". | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The University of Arizona. | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Language, Modern. | en_US |
| dc.title | "The Refutation of the Grammarians" by Ibn Mada' al-Qurtubi: A translation, with syntactic analysis of "Bab al-Ishtighal" | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) | en_US |
| thesis.degree.grantor | University of Arizona | en_US |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en_US |
| dc.identifier.proquest | 9829399 | en_US |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Graduate College | en_US |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Near Eastern Studies | en_US |
| thesis.degree.name | Ph.D. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.bibrecord | .b38564038 | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-13T23:02:53Z | |
| html.description.abstract | Government and Binding Theory dictates that the case features of noun phrases are assigned structurally under government. On this basis the claim by Ibn Mada'al-Qurtubi, in The Refutation of the Grammarians, that case is assigned solely by the language user on strictly semantic grounds, is rejected; also untenable, however, is the position of traditional Arab grammarians that case can, in some contexts, be assigned by "concealed" governors, as the Projection and Structure-Preserving Principles require that material having semantic content be visible at all levels of representation. Government and Binding principles are adequate to account for case-assignment in the issues raised by Ibn Mada'; they cannot, however, offer a clear solution to the apparent violation of Principle C of the Binding Theory found in some examples of bab al-tanazuᶜ, the category of "contention in government". |
