Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShuttleworth, W. Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorSen, Omer Lutfi
dc.creatorSen, Omer Lutfien_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-25T09:59:51Z
dc.date.available2013-04-25T09:59:51Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/284191
dc.description.abstractGeneral Circulation Models are important tools in the study of the earth's climate system. The terrestrial surface forms the lower boundary to such models over continents and a well-defined lower boundary is crucial for reliable climate simulations because the Earth interacts with the atmosphere via this boundary. The primary motivation for this research is to improve the parameterization of these interactions in General Circulation Models using field data and calibration techniques. For this purpose, a recent version of Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme was selected, studied, and then calibrated for five different vegetation types using multi-criteria calibration techniques. The associated parameter sets were then tested in a ten-year climate integration with Version 3 of the Community Climate Model. The present study explored the methodology needed to use the growing number of relevant field data sets effectively and efficiently better to parameterize the land surface in a GCM. It showed that such field data can, indeed, be used in this way, not only to improve simulations but also to understand models' capabilities and deficiencies. Calibrating the land surface parameterization significantly improved simulations relative to the original default parameterization but several physically based land surface models studied, once calibrated, were found to give equally good simulations of the land surface processes. The primary results are that it is possible to obtain a single preferred parameter sets for different vegetation types using multi-criteria calibration, and that using calibrated parameter sets in climate models can improve the representation of surface exchanges and the modeled climate given by a GCM.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectHydrology.en_US
dc.titleImproving the parameterization of land-surface interactions in GCMs using field dataen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.identifier.proquest9983861en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineHydrology and Water Resourcesen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b40823337en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-19T00:17:40Z
html.description.abstractGeneral Circulation Models are important tools in the study of the earth's climate system. The terrestrial surface forms the lower boundary to such models over continents and a well-defined lower boundary is crucial for reliable climate simulations because the Earth interacts with the atmosphere via this boundary. The primary motivation for this research is to improve the parameterization of these interactions in General Circulation Models using field data and calibration techniques. For this purpose, a recent version of Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme was selected, studied, and then calibrated for five different vegetation types using multi-criteria calibration techniques. The associated parameter sets were then tested in a ten-year climate integration with Version 3 of the Community Climate Model. The present study explored the methodology needed to use the growing number of relevant field data sets effectively and efficiently better to parameterize the land surface in a GCM. It showed that such field data can, indeed, be used in this way, not only to improve simulations but also to understand models' capabilities and deficiencies. Calibrating the land surface parameterization significantly improved simulations relative to the original default parameterization but several physically based land surface models studied, once calibrated, were found to give equally good simulations of the land surface processes. The primary results are that it is possible to obtain a single preferred parameter sets for different vegetation types using multi-criteria calibration, and that using calibrated parameter sets in climate models can improve the representation of surface exchanges and the modeled climate given by a GCM.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_9983861_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
4.658Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record