We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBerry, Laura C.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorCanfield, J. Douglasen_US
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Amy Catherine
dc.creatorMurphy, Amy Catherineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-09T09:26:49Z
dc.date.available2013-05-09T09:26:49Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/289038
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation argues that social investigators, novelists and prose writers often demonstrate similar concerns with regard to the status of workers and deploy workers to register and mitigate anxieties about industrialism and its effects. All of these writers consider what status workers should have as an emerging class. By embodying the fears and hopes of the industrial epoch, workers both serve and threaten a national identity increasingly built around Britain's industrial prowess. In chapter one, I compare Elizabeth Gaskell's 1848 novel Mary Barton and James Kay's 1832 political pamphlet, The Moral and Physical Conditions of the Working Classes. In considering the problem of the worker, middle-class utilitarians such as Kay differ sharply from working-class sympathizers such as Gaskell. Nevertheless, each suggests that the charity of the wealthier classes should be an instrument to alleviate the worker's suffering and to improve his physical condition. Thus, both Gaskell and Kay see paternalism as the solution. In chapter two I discuss the problem the worker poses to representation, showing that he challenges the fiction of organic society by resisting definition and placement within it. Focusing on George Eliot's 1856 essay on Riehl, "A Natural History of German Life," I argue that through the construction of what she calls "incarnate history"--the living connection all social ranks have to the past--she determines the worker's status. In addition, I show how Eliot's Adam Bede enacts what she considers to be a realistic portrayal of the worker. In contrast to the idealizations figured in popular iconography, Eliot calls for a realistic depiction of the worker as he actually exists. Eliot rejects the idyllic representation of the worker often demonstrated in the paintings she criticizes, yet reproduces this idealization in her characterization of Adam Bede, assimilating the worker into a vision of progress and social organization to which he no longer poses a threat. In chapter three, I explore Charlotte Bronte's investigation of a society governed by paternalism in Shirley (1849), developing an analysis of her revelation that the plight of workers and the condition of women are inextricably bound in an oppressive social order.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectLiterature, English.en_US
dc.title"The awful facts": Figurations of the worker in nineteenth-century British literatureen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.identifier.proquest9946862en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEnglishen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b39918993en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-06T06:58:52Z
html.description.abstractThis dissertation argues that social investigators, novelists and prose writers often demonstrate similar concerns with regard to the status of workers and deploy workers to register and mitigate anxieties about industrialism and its effects. All of these writers consider what status workers should have as an emerging class. By embodying the fears and hopes of the industrial epoch, workers both serve and threaten a national identity increasingly built around Britain's industrial prowess. In chapter one, I compare Elizabeth Gaskell's 1848 novel Mary Barton and James Kay's 1832 political pamphlet, The Moral and Physical Conditions of the Working Classes. In considering the problem of the worker, middle-class utilitarians such as Kay differ sharply from working-class sympathizers such as Gaskell. Nevertheless, each suggests that the charity of the wealthier classes should be an instrument to alleviate the worker's suffering and to improve his physical condition. Thus, both Gaskell and Kay see paternalism as the solution. In chapter two I discuss the problem the worker poses to representation, showing that he challenges the fiction of organic society by resisting definition and placement within it. Focusing on George Eliot's 1856 essay on Riehl, "A Natural History of German Life," I argue that through the construction of what she calls "incarnate history"--the living connection all social ranks have to the past--she determines the worker's status. In addition, I show how Eliot's Adam Bede enacts what she considers to be a realistic portrayal of the worker. In contrast to the idealizations figured in popular iconography, Eliot calls for a realistic depiction of the worker as he actually exists. Eliot rejects the idyllic representation of the worker often demonstrated in the paintings she criticizes, yet reproduces this idealization in her characterization of Adam Bede, assimilating the worker into a vision of progress and social organization to which he no longer poses a threat. In chapter three, I explore Charlotte Bronte's investigation of a society governed by paternalism in Shirley (1849), developing an analysis of her revelation that the plight of workers and the condition of women are inextricably bound in an oppressive social order.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_9946862_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
4.185Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record