The use of fear appeals in genetic testing
| dc.contributor.advisor | Buller, David B. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Grandpre, Joseph Roy | |
| dc.creator | Grandpre, Joseph Roy | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-05-09T09:27:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-05-09T09:27:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1999 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289047 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The traditional model of medicine involves recognizing symptoms, undergoing diagnostic tests to find the cause of the symptoms, and provide treatment to relieve or cure the underlying disease. However, with the advent of genetic testing and the ability to diagnose asymptomatic individuals, the traditional model of diagnostic testing and treatment no longer applies. By employing the Extended Parallel Processing Model, EPPM, and utilizing messages similar to fear appeals, this study examined participants' perceptions of testing and treatment efficacy, behavioral intentions to undergo testing, and attitudes towards traditional and genetically-based diagnostic testing. Results indicated that the type of diagnostic test and the temporal proximity of the treatment with respect to the diagnostic test is important in determining the perceived efficacy of testing, treatment, and intent to undergo testing. Practical as well as theoretical implications are discussed as well as directions for future research. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The University of Arizona. | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Speech Communication. | en_US |
| dc.title | The use of fear appeals in genetic testing | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) | en_US |
| thesis.degree.grantor | University of Arizona | en_US |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en_US |
| dc.identifier.proquest | 9957939 | en_US |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Graduate College | en_US |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Communication | en_US |
| thesis.degree.name | Ph.D. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.bibrecord | .b40114612 | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-30T00:53:17Z | |
| html.description.abstract | The traditional model of medicine involves recognizing symptoms, undergoing diagnostic tests to find the cause of the symptoms, and provide treatment to relieve or cure the underlying disease. However, with the advent of genetic testing and the ability to diagnose asymptomatic individuals, the traditional model of diagnostic testing and treatment no longer applies. By employing the Extended Parallel Processing Model, EPPM, and utilizing messages similar to fear appeals, this study examined participants' perceptions of testing and treatment efficacy, behavioral intentions to undergo testing, and attitudes towards traditional and genetically-based diagnostic testing. Results indicated that the type of diagnostic test and the temporal proximity of the treatment with respect to the diagnostic test is important in determining the perceived efficacy of testing, treatment, and intent to undergo testing. Practical as well as theoretical implications are discussed as well as directions for future research. |
