Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWilkin, Donovanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrachy, Suzanne, 1962-
dc.creatorTrachy, Suzanne, 1962-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T09:37:01Z
dc.date.available2013-05-16T09:37:01Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/291698
dc.description.abstractThe Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) reflects society's concern over the rate of species extinction and aims to halt or reverse this trend. Several policies of the ESA protect listed species over resource development projects. Due to this protection, several listed species have recently experienced a recovery. Two have been removed, or delisted, from the federal Endangered Species list. Once a recovered species becomes delisted, the majority of these protections are removed. This paper analyzes the political implications of such delistings utilizing formal interviews, personal experiences, and a literature search. Through analysis, it is found that two specific policies seem to protect delisted species. It is concluded that a quantitative analysis may be premature at this time due to the small number of recovered species and that these policies must be effected to their fullest potential to ensure the long-term success of the federal endangered species program.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture, Forestry and Wildlife.en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, General.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences.en_US
dc.titleThe Endangered Species Act: Political implications of delisting a recovered speciesen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeThesis-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.identifier.proquest1344029en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineRenewable Natural Resourcesen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.bibrecord.b2691752xen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-30T01:54:26Z
html.description.abstractThe Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) reflects society's concern over the rate of species extinction and aims to halt or reverse this trend. Several policies of the ESA protect listed species over resource development projects. Due to this protection, several listed species have recently experienced a recovery. Two have been removed, or delisted, from the federal Endangered Species list. Once a recovered species becomes delisted, the majority of these protections are removed. This paper analyzes the political implications of such delistings utilizing formal interviews, personal experiences, and a literature search. Through analysis, it is found that two specific policies seem to protect delisted species. It is concluded that a quantitative analysis may be premature at this time due to the small number of recovered species and that these policies must be effected to their fullest potential to ensure the long-term success of the federal endangered species program.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_1344029_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
4.986Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record