Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorUrea, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorHarnenz, Zoe Tempest*
dc.creatorHarnenz, Zoe Tempesten_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-08T16:23:33Z
dc.date.available2013-08-08T16:23:33Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/297642
dc.description.abstractWith the goal of understanding how women are viewed when they are sick, I researched Latin American literature written in the 1800s. I chose the two Romantic works María and Carmen and the two naturalist pieces Nelly and ¿Inocentes o Culpables? Novela Naturalista because of the predominant theme of disease in these writings. I examined representations of ill female characters to elucidate how some Latin American nineteenth century authors viewed sicknesses in women. In comparing the illness of the female protagonists, I found that in both periods, the etiology of illness in women posits that it derives from the nature of their gender. I also discovered a crucial difference between the women’s portrayal in the romantic and naturalist novels. In the two romantic stories, the women are portrayed as innocent victims of their diseases; while in the two naturalist pieces, the females are rendered as guilty creators of their own disorders. Along the way, I observed that ethnicity sometimes functions much like gender - as influential in determining the supposed origin of sickness. I also discovered that medical science is used to back up these socially constructed explanations of disease.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.titleVictim or Perpetrator? An Examination of Diseased Female Characters in Nineteenth Century Latin America Romantic and Naturalist Novelsen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesisen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelbachelorsen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineHonors Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSpanish Literatureen_US
thesis.degree.nameB.A.en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-30T09:47:08Z
html.description.abstractWith the goal of understanding how women are viewed when they are sick, I researched Latin American literature written in the 1800s. I chose the two Romantic works María and Carmen and the two naturalist pieces Nelly and ¿Inocentes o Culpables? Novela Naturalista because of the predominant theme of disease in these writings. I examined representations of ill female characters to elucidate how some Latin American nineteenth century authors viewed sicknesses in women. In comparing the illness of the female protagonists, I found that in both periods, the etiology of illness in women posits that it derives from the nature of their gender. I also discovered a crucial difference between the women’s portrayal in the romantic and naturalist novels. In the two romantic stories, the women are portrayed as innocent victims of their diseases; while in the two naturalist pieces, the females are rendered as guilty creators of their own disorders. Along the way, I observed that ethnicity sometimes functions much like gender - as influential in determining the supposed origin of sickness. I also discovered that medical science is used to back up these socially constructed explanations of disease.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_mr_2013_0100_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
329.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record