Objective and Subjective Analysis of Transition Probabilities of Monthly Flow on an Ephemeral Stream
dc.contributor.author | Dvoranchik, William | |
dc.contributor.author | Duckstein, Lucien | |
dc.contributor.author | Kisiel, Chester C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-08-29T15:04:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-29T15:04:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1972-05-06 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0272-6106 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/300237 | |
dc.description | From the Proceedings of the 1972 Meetings of the Arizona Section - American Water Resources Assn. and the Hydrology Section - Arizona Academy of Science - May 5-6, 1972, Prescott, Arizona | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A critique of statistical properties of monthly flows on an ephemeral stream in Arizona is given. A subjective procedure, justified for managerial purposes not concerned with the variability of flow within the month, is proposed for sequential generation of monthly flow data. Ephemeral flows should be modeled by starting with at least historical daily flows for more meaningful monthly flow models. Stochastic properties of monthly streamflows and state transition probabilities are reviewed with regard to ephemeral streams. A flow chart for a streamflow model geared to digital computers, with a simulation of streamflow subroutine, is developed. Meaningful monthly flow models could serve as a check on alternative models (subjective matrix, lag-one auto regressive, harmonic, bivariate normal, bivariate log-normal models). Rules and guidelines are presented in developing meaningful probability matrices. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrology -- Arizona. | en_US |
dc.subject | Water resources development -- Arizona. | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrology -- Southwestern states. | en_US |
dc.subject | Water resources development -- Southwestern states. | en_US |
dc.subject | Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Probability | en_US |
dc.subject | Monthly | en_US |
dc.subject | Ephemeral streams | en_US |
dc.subject | Statistical methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Watershed management | en_US |
dc.subject | Stochastic processes | en_US |
dc.subject | Daily hydrographs | en_US |
dc.subject | Streamflow forecasting | en_US |
dc.subject | Model studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Digital computers | en_US |
dc.subject | Simulation analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Regulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Arizona | en_US |
dc.subject | Arid lands | en_US |
dc.title | Objective and Subjective Analysis of Transition Probabilities of Monthly Flow on an Ephemeral Stream | en_US |
dc.type | text | en_US |
dc.type | Proceedings | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest | en_US |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This article is part of the Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest collections. Digital access to this material is made possible by the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science and the University of Arizona Libraries. For more information about items in this collection, contact anashydrology@gmail.com. | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-30T13:39:03Z | |
html.description.abstract | A critique of statistical properties of monthly flows on an ephemeral stream in Arizona is given. A subjective procedure, justified for managerial purposes not concerned with the variability of flow within the month, is proposed for sequential generation of monthly flow data. Ephemeral flows should be modeled by starting with at least historical daily flows for more meaningful monthly flow models. Stochastic properties of monthly streamflows and state transition probabilities are reviewed with regard to ephemeral streams. A flow chart for a streamflow model geared to digital computers, with a simulation of streamflow subroutine, is developed. Meaningful monthly flow models could serve as a check on alternative models (subjective matrix, lag-one auto regressive, harmonic, bivariate normal, bivariate log-normal models). Rules and guidelines are presented in developing meaningful probability matrices. |