Action Programs for Water Yield Improvement on Arizona's Watersheds: Political Constrains to Implementation
dc.contributor.author | Cortner, H. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Berry, M. P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-09-04T22:47:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-09-04T22:47:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1978-04-15 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0272-6106 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/301041 | |
dc.description | From the Proceedings of the 1978 Meetings of the Arizona Section - American Water Resources Assn. and the Hydrology Section - Arizona Academy of Science - April 14-15, 1978, Flagstaff, Arizona | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Although the Arizona Watershed Program 's (AWP) research efforts have had considerable success over the past 22 years in its objective to further knowledge of the feasibility of vegetative manipulation and modification as a method of increasing surface water yields, its principal sponsor and supporter, the Arizona Water Resources (AWRC), has not, to date, met with similar success. Described are three of the AWRC 's unsuccessful attempts to implement on-going action programs of vegetative management for water yield improvement: The Barr Report, the Ffolliott-Thorud Report, and the Globe Chaparral controversy, to illustrate how overstated program goals, unrealistic assumptions about the political feasibility of treatment types, extent, and intensity; failure to recognize the emergence of significant new decision-making participants, and unsettled questions concerning program costs and beneficiaries have contributed to setbacks in these programs. It is suggested that political as well as scientific constraints have accounted for reported failures in the implementation of the AWP action program objectives. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrology -- Arizona. | en_US |
dc.subject | Water resources development -- Arizona. | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrology -- Southwestern states. | en_US |
dc.subject | Water resources development -- Southwestern states. | en_US |
dc.subject | Project post-evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | Water yield improvement | en_US |
dc.subject | Administrative agencies | en_US |
dc.subject | Political constraints | en_US |
dc.subject | Watershed management | en_US |
dc.subject | Surface waters | en_US |
dc.subject | Comprehensive planning | en_US |
dc.subject | Economic efficiency | en_US |
dc.subject | Decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | Project planning | en_US |
dc.subject | Arizona Water Resources Committee | en_US |
dc.subject | Arizona Watershed Program | en_US |
dc.subject | Evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | Vegetation effects | en_US |
dc.title | Action Programs for Water Yield Improvement on Arizona's Watersheds: Political Constrains to Implementation | en_US |
dc.type | text | en_US |
dc.type | Proceedings | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest | en_US |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This article is part of the Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest collections. Digital access to this material is made possible by the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science and the University of Arizona Libraries. For more information about items in this collection, contact anashydrology@gmail.com. | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-05T19:10:13Z | |
html.description.abstract | Although the Arizona Watershed Program 's (AWP) research efforts have had considerable success over the past 22 years in its objective to further knowledge of the feasibility of vegetative manipulation and modification as a method of increasing surface water yields, its principal sponsor and supporter, the Arizona Water Resources (AWRC), has not, to date, met with similar success. Described are three of the AWRC 's unsuccessful attempts to implement on-going action programs of vegetative management for water yield improvement: The Barr Report, the Ffolliott-Thorud Report, and the Globe Chaparral controversy, to illustrate how overstated program goals, unrealistic assumptions about the political feasibility of treatment types, extent, and intensity; failure to recognize the emergence of significant new decision-making participants, and unsettled questions concerning program costs and beneficiaries have contributed to setbacks in these programs. It is suggested that political as well as scientific constraints have accounted for reported failures in the implementation of the AWP action program objectives. |