A Multiattribute Approach to the Reclamation of Stripmined Lands
| dc.contributor.author | Brinck, Fritz H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Duckstein, Lucien | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thames, John L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-09-05T17:42:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-09-05T17:42:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1979-04-13 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0272-6106 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/301152 | |
| dc.description | From the Proceedings of the 1979 Meetings of the Arizona Section - American Water Resources Assn. and the Hydrology Section - Arizona - Nevada Academy of Science - April 13,1979, Tempe, Arizona | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | A multiattribute utility function is used to model preferences on outcomes of alternative reclamation schemes for stripmined lands, using Arizona and Wyoming examples. Each scheme should at least help restore land to its premining value, and is composed of three sets of actions: mining operations, preparations for postmining land use, and mitigating actions. Grazing and runoff augmentation are examples of postmining land use goals, and mitigating actions may be measures to protect the environment like pollution control in runoff or infiltration. Conflicting objectives are involved, including the maintenance of sufficient coal production, the alleviation of detrimental environmental effects, and the minimization of loss. Since the environmental effects are fraught with uncertainty, a multiobjective decision-making scheme under uncertainty is set up to analyze the problem. The decision model ranks alternative reclamation schemes on the basis of the preference function of a group decision maker, each member of which assessing a separate subset of single attribute utility functions. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hydrology -- Arizona. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Water resources development -- Arizona. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hydrology -- Southwestern states. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Water resources development -- Southwestern states. | en_US |
| dc.title | A Multiattribute Approach to the Reclamation of Stripmined Lands | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en_US |
| dc.type | Proceedings | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona | en_US |
| dc.identifier.journal | Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest | en_US |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | This article is part of the Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest collections. Digital access to this material is made possible by the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science and the University of Arizona Libraries. For more information about items in this collection, contact anashydrology@gmail.com. | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-24T15:48:00Z | |
| html.description.abstract | A multiattribute utility function is used to model preferences on outcomes of alternative reclamation schemes for stripmined lands, using Arizona and Wyoming examples. Each scheme should at least help restore land to its premining value, and is composed of three sets of actions: mining operations, preparations for postmining land use, and mitigating actions. Grazing and runoff augmentation are examples of postmining land use goals, and mitigating actions may be measures to protect the environment like pollution control in runoff or infiltration. Conflicting objectives are involved, including the maintenance of sufficient coal production, the alleviation of detrimental environmental effects, and the minimization of loss. Since the environmental effects are fraught with uncertainty, a multiobjective decision-making scheme under uncertainty is set up to analyze the problem. The decision model ranks alternative reclamation schemes on the basis of the preference function of a group decision maker, each member of which assessing a separate subset of single attribute utility functions. |
