Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRhoades, Garyen_US
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Olave, Blanca Minerva
dc.creatorTorres-Olave, Blanca Minervaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T02:15:58Z
dc.date.available2013-11-27T02:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/305866
dc.description.abstractThe present study examined the extent to which the U.S. STEM labor market is stratified in terms of quality of employment. Through a series of cluster analyses and Chi-square tests on data drawn from the 2008 Survey of Income Program Participation (SIPP), the study found evidence of segmentation in the highly-skilled STEM and non-STEM samples, which included workers with a subbaccalaureate diploma or above. The cluster analyses show a pattern consistent with Labor Market Segmentation theory: Higher wages are associated with other primary employment characteristics, including health insurance and pension benefits, as well as full-time employment. In turn, lower wages showed a tendency to cluster with secondary employment characteristics, such as part-time employment, multiple employment, and restricted access to health insurance and pension benefits. The findings also suggest that women have a higher likelihood of being employed in STEM jobs with secondary characteristics. The findings reveal a far more variegated employment landscape than is usually presented in national reports of the STEM workforce. There is evidence that, while STEM employment may be more resilient than non-STEM employment to labor restructuring trends in the new economy, the former is far from immune to secondary labor characteristics. There is a need for ongoing dialogue between STEM education (at all levels), employers, policymakers, and other stakeholders to truly understand not only the barriers to equity in employment relations, but also the mechanisms that create and maintain segmentation and how they may impact women, underrepresented minorities, and the foreign-born.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectContingent laboren_US
dc.subjectLabor market segmentationen_US
dc.subjectSTEM degree outcomesen_US
dc.subjectSTEM employmenten_US
dc.subjectSub-baccalaureate degreesen_US
dc.subjectHigher Educationen_US
dc.subjectCluster analysisen_US
dc.titleSTEM Employment in the New Economy: A Labor Market Segmentation Approachen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeElectronic Dissertationen_US
dc.contributor.chairRhoades, Garyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLee, Jenny J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJaquette, Ozanen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRhoades, Garyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineHigher Educationen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-15T10:16:06Z
html.description.abstractThe present study examined the extent to which the U.S. STEM labor market is stratified in terms of quality of employment. Through a series of cluster analyses and Chi-square tests on data drawn from the 2008 Survey of Income Program Participation (SIPP), the study found evidence of segmentation in the highly-skilled STEM and non-STEM samples, which included workers with a subbaccalaureate diploma or above. The cluster analyses show a pattern consistent with Labor Market Segmentation theory: Higher wages are associated with other primary employment characteristics, including health insurance and pension benefits, as well as full-time employment. In turn, lower wages showed a tendency to cluster with secondary employment characteristics, such as part-time employment, multiple employment, and restricted access to health insurance and pension benefits. The findings also suggest that women have a higher likelihood of being employed in STEM jobs with secondary characteristics. The findings reveal a far more variegated employment landscape than is usually presented in national reports of the STEM workforce. There is evidence that, while STEM employment may be more resilient than non-STEM employment to labor restructuring trends in the new economy, the former is far from immune to secondary labor characteristics. There is a need for ongoing dialogue between STEM education (at all levels), employers, policymakers, and other stakeholders to truly understand not only the barriers to equity in employment relations, but also the mechanisms that create and maintain segmentation and how they may impact women, underrepresented minorities, and the foreign-born.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_12976_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
3.059Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record