We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.
Genealogical Correspondence of Learning and Memory Centers across Phyla
Author
Wolff, Gabriella HannahIssue Date
2015Advisor
Strausfeld, Nicholas J.
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The University of Arizona.Rights
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.Embargo
Release after 29-Apr-2016Abstract
Across bilaterian phyla, learning and memory allows animals to benefit from central-place foraging, return to ideal food sources, choose mates and avoid dangerous or harmful external stimuli. Although these behaviors are comparable in both vertebrate and invertebrate animals, it is unknown whether or not they are mediated by homologous brain structures. In insects, paired, lobate forebrain structures called mushroom bodies receive input from primary sensory neuropils and are necessary for learning and memory, whereas in crustaceans, this behavior is mediated by paired, compact forebrain structures called hemiellipsoid bodies. Mammalian learning and memory is mediated by the paired, horn-shaped hippocampi, which also receive sensory input and are likewise situated in the forebrain. Did these structures evolve independently along with the ability for animals to learn and remember associations and places? Alternatively, the hypothesis posited in this dissertation is that the last bilaterian ancestor already possessed the ability to learn and adapt to its environment, behavior mediated by paired forebrain structures that evolved divergently into the elaborated forms we observe in extant, crown-group taxa. This hypothesis is investigated and discussed in the following reports: 1) a review of insect brain anatomy and functional connectivity, including a description of mushroom bodies, in the context of arthropod evolution; 2) a comparison of neuroanatomy, circuitry, and protein expression between insect mushroom bodies and Malacostracan crustacean hemiellipsoid bodies, using cockroaches and Caribbean hermit crabs as representatives of their classes; 3) a deeper investigation of the fine structure of neuronal organization in the hemiellipsoid body of the Caribbean hermit crab, focusing on electron microscopical observations and comparisons to the ultrastructure of the fruit fly mushroom body; 4) a survey of four invertebrate Phyla, employing the strategy of comparing neuroanatomy and protein expression to investigate whether higher order forebrain structures in these animals were inherited from a common ancestor; 5) a comparison of neuroanatomy, connectivity, and protein expression in insect mushroom bodies and mammalian hippocampus, including a survey of PKA-Cα in these and corresponding structures across the Chordata. The total evidence suggests that a common Bilaterian ancestor possessed a center that evolved to become mushroom bodies in invertebrates and hippocampus in vertebrates.Type
textElectronic Dissertation
Degree Name
Ph.D.Degree Level
doctoralDegree Program
Graduate CollegeNeuroscience