Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMilward, H. Brintonen
dc.contributor.authorJoosse, Alexandra Pocek
dc.creatorJoosse, Alexandra Poceken
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T21:43:29Zen
dc.date.available2015-09-11T21:43:29Zen
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/577215en
dc.description.abstractThe research described herein focuses on understanding the effects of power on the processes and outcomes of collaborative networks. Power is conceptualized from a structural perspective, as the dependence that exists in the relationships that tie network participants together. Using the method of social network analysis, the dissertation first validates a measure of structural power in collaborative networks, betweenness centrality. It then examines the effect of uneven distributions of structural power among participants on an important variable for these networks: cohesion, as measured from a behavioral perspective. This effect is examined from the perspective of two levels of analysis: the whole network level and the working group level. The results indicate that structural power has a variable effect on cohesion, depending on the level of analysis. At the whole network level, uneven distributions of power negatively affect the cohesive behavior of participants. At the working group level, on the other hand, the relationship between the variables is curvilinear. Finally, the effect of structural power on three dimensions of participant satisfaction is examined: process satisfaction, human capital satisfaction, and outcome satisfaction. The research finds that being in a power disadvantaged position affects how participants rate their satisfaction with the process of collaboration.
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en
dc.subjectCollaborationen
dc.subjectCross-sectoren
dc.subjectNetworksen
dc.subjectParticipant satisfactionen
dc.subjectStructural poweren
dc.subjectPolitical Scienceen
dc.subjectCohesionen
dc.titlePower in Collaborative Networksen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeElectronic Dissertationen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeememberMilward, H. Brintonen
dc.contributor.committeememberEmerson, Kirken
dc.contributor.committeememberGalaskiewicz, Josephen
dc.contributor.committeememberHenry, Adamen
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Scienceen
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-10T09:38:16Z
html.description.abstractThe research described herein focuses on understanding the effects of power on the processes and outcomes of collaborative networks. Power is conceptualized from a structural perspective, as the dependence that exists in the relationships that tie network participants together. Using the method of social network analysis, the dissertation first validates a measure of structural power in collaborative networks, betweenness centrality. It then examines the effect of uneven distributions of structural power among participants on an important variable for these networks: cohesion, as measured from a behavioral perspective. This effect is examined from the perspective of two levels of analysis: the whole network level and the working group level. The results indicate that structural power has a variable effect on cohesion, depending on the level of analysis. At the whole network level, uneven distributions of power negatively affect the cohesive behavior of participants. At the working group level, on the other hand, the relationship between the variables is curvilinear. Finally, the effect of structural power on three dimensions of participant satisfaction is examined: process satisfaction, human capital satisfaction, and outcome satisfaction. The research finds that being in a power disadvantaged position affects how participants rate their satisfaction with the process of collaboration.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_14063_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
1.319Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record