Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShaw, Linda R.en
dc.contributor.authorBourgeois, Paul J.
dc.creatorBourgeois, Paul J.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-22T22:27:30Zen
dc.date.available2015-09-22T22:27:30Zen
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/578618en
dc.description.abstractEach of the following three articles offers a distinct thesis regarding the clinical supervision of rehabilitation counselor students and the use of technology. While the research questions and perspectives in each of the articles are different from one another, the articles are similar in that they all examine the same course, more specifically, clinical practicum in rehabilitation counseling. The focus of the first article (Chapter 2), "Content Analysis of Rehabilitation Education/Rehabilitation Research, Policy and Education: 1995-2015," was to conduct a content analysis of Rehabilitation Education (later renamed Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education [RE/RRPE]) to determine publication trends. Additionally, the authors wanted to ascertain how often articles were written in RE/RRPE focusing specifically on the use of technology in the training and supervision of rehabilitation counseling graduate students. The second article found in Chapter 3 is titled "A Selected Review of Clinical Supervision Practices as Documented in Rehabilitation Counseling Syllabi." It examines a select group of practicum courses and their corresponding syllabi offered in graduate rehabilitation counselor education programs. The review includes the definition and objectives of practicum, and a review of the current methods utilized in conducting supervision, especially the use of technology and distance modalities. The third article (Chapter 4) titled "Rehabilitation Counseling Practicum–Interviews with Selected Faculty Supervisors" looks at the perspectives of rehabilitation counseling faculty in relation to the current and future uses of technology and distance modalities in the training and supervision of counseling students during their practicum fieldwork experiences.
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en
dc.subjectRehabilitationen
dc.titleClinical Supervision of Rehabilitation Counselors and the Use of Technologyen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeElectronic Dissertationen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeememberShaw, Linda R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberHartley, Michael T.en
dc.contributor.committeememberOzkan-Czerkawski, Betulen
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen
thesis.degree.disciplineRehabilitationen
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-16T15:54:54Z
html.description.abstractEach of the following three articles offers a distinct thesis regarding the clinical supervision of rehabilitation counselor students and the use of technology. While the research questions and perspectives in each of the articles are different from one another, the articles are similar in that they all examine the same course, more specifically, clinical practicum in rehabilitation counseling. The focus of the first article (Chapter 2), "Content Analysis of Rehabilitation Education/Rehabilitation Research, Policy and Education: 1995-2015," was to conduct a content analysis of Rehabilitation Education (later renamed Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education [RE/RRPE]) to determine publication trends. Additionally, the authors wanted to ascertain how often articles were written in RE/RRPE focusing specifically on the use of technology in the training and supervision of rehabilitation counseling graduate students. The second article found in Chapter 3 is titled "A Selected Review of Clinical Supervision Practices as Documented in Rehabilitation Counseling Syllabi." It examines a select group of practicum courses and their corresponding syllabi offered in graduate rehabilitation counselor education programs. The review includes the definition and objectives of practicum, and a review of the current methods utilized in conducting supervision, especially the use of technology and distance modalities. The third article (Chapter 4) titled "Rehabilitation Counseling Practicum–Interviews with Selected Faculty Supervisors" looks at the perspectives of rehabilitation counseling faculty in relation to the current and future uses of technology and distance modalities in the training and supervision of counseling students during their practicum fieldwork experiences.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_14174_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
533.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record