Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaird, Daniel T.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-16T17:44:30Zen
dc.date.available2016-02-16T17:44:30Zen
dc.date.issued2015-10en
dc.identifier.issn0884-5123en
dc.identifier.issn0074-9079en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/596414en
dc.descriptionITC/USA 2015 Conference Proceedings / The Fifty-First Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 26-29, 2015 / Bally's Hotel & Convention Center, Las Vegas, NVen_US
dc.description.abstractOver the past several years DoD imposed constraints on test deliverables, requiring objective measures of test results, i.e., statistically defensible test and evaluation (SDT&E) methods and results. These constraints force testers to employ statistical hypotheses, analyses and modeling to assess test results objectively, i.e., based on statistical metrics, analytical methods, probability of confidence complemented by, rather than solely on expertise, which is too subjective. In this and companion papers we discuss methods of objectifying testing. We employ an earth coordinate model and statistical modeling of telemetry (TM) tracking antenna employing time-space position information (TSPI) and derived statistical measures for tracking-error and auto-tracking mode. Test data were statistically analyzed via analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) which revealed that the antenna control unit (ACU) under test (AUT) does not track statistically identically, nor as practically or efficiently in C-band while receiving data carriers in both S- and C-bands. The conclusions of this paper add support to that hypothesis. In this third of three papers we use data from a range test, but make no reference to the systems under test as the purpose of this paper is to present an example of tools useful for employing a SDT&E methodology.
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherInternational Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.telemetry.org/en
dc.rightsCopyright © held by the author; distribution rights International Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectH₀en
dc.subjecttracking modeen
dc.subjecttracking erroren
dc.subjectTMen
dc.subjectAGCen
dc.subjectACUen
dc.subjectATen
dc.subjectScanen
dc.subjectSlewen
dc.subjectGPSen
dc.subjectTSPI samplesen
dc.subjectobservables and predictorsen
dc.subjectANOVAen
dc.subjectANCOVAen
dc.subjectF-testen
dc.subjectt-testen
dc.subjectPDFen
dc.subjectstatistical modelen
dc.subjectinner-producten
dc.subjectlinear predictoren
dc.subjectlink functionen
dc.subjectlogiten
dc.subjectlogistic regressionen
dc.subjectstochastic filteren
dc.titleLogistics Regression Model on Antenna Control Unit Autotracking Modeen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeProceedingsen
dc.identifier.journalInternational Telemetering Conference Proceedingsen
dc.description.collectioninformationProceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection.en
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-11T05:39:49Z
html.description.abstractOver the past several years DoD imposed constraints on test deliverables, requiring objective measures of test results, i.e., statistically defensible test and evaluation (SDT&E) methods and results. These constraints force testers to employ statistical hypotheses, analyses and modeling to assess test results objectively, i.e., based on statistical metrics, analytical methods, probability of confidence complemented by, rather than solely on expertise, which is too subjective. In this and companion papers we discuss methods of objectifying testing. We employ an earth coordinate model and statistical modeling of telemetry (TM) tracking antenna employing time-space position information (TSPI) and derived statistical measures for tracking-error and auto-tracking mode. Test data were statistically analyzed via analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) which revealed that the antenna control unit (ACU) under test (AUT) does not track statistically identically, nor as practically or efficiently in C-band while receiving data carriers in both S- and C-bands. The conclusions of this paper add support to that hypothesis. In this third of three papers we use data from a range test, but make no reference to the systems under test as the purpose of this paper is to present an example of tools useful for employing a SDT&E methodology.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ITC_2015_15-06-03.pdf
Size:
557.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record