RSS 1.0Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
ABOUT THE COLLECTIONS
Several University of Arizona organizations, such as colleges, departments, research and administrative groups, have established collections in the UA Campus Repository to share, archive and preserve unique materials.
These materials range from historical and archival documents, to technical reports, bulletins, community education materials, working papers, and other unique publications.
QUESTIONS?
Please contact Campus Repository Services personnel repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions about items in these collections, or if you are affiliated with the University of Arizona and are interested in establishing a collection in the repository. We look forward to working with you.
Sub-communities within this community
Recent Submissions
-
First Foliar Insecticide Special Local Needs Registrations for Palestriped Flea Beetle Control During Guayule Stand EstablishmentThe Palestriped Flea Beetle, Systena blanda, is one of the larger flea beetles in North America. These beetles can eat entire cotyledons and stem of the plant and an individual can consume an entire guayule seedling in a matter of minutes. Protection of the cotyledons is paramount to successful establishment of guayule. The Arizona Department of Agriculture has approved Special Local Needs registrations for Acenthrin™ and Acephate® 97Up plus Bifenture® EC for use against palestriped flea beetles in guayule. This document includes a general discussion of flea beetle management in guayule during stand establishment and guidelines for insecticidal control.
-
Pale-Striped Flea Beetles in Young Cotton StandsA guide to protecting young and emerging cotton from flea beetle damage and the factors to consider in determining control options.
-
Does the type of medical insurance influence outcome after hip or knee total joint replacement?Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if Medicaid, Medicare and private patients undergoing primary total knee and hip arthroplasty reported different outcome scores. Methods: From 2014-2016, 1076 patients that underwent a total hip arthroplasty and 1936 patients that underwent a total knee arthroplasty and completed a series KOOS/HOOS patient reported outcomes surveys. Available demographic information included gender, age, BMI and payer status. Baseline (pre-surgery) , 3-month and 1-year post-surgery survey responses were collected utilizing a web-based data collection system and reporting platform. Parametric and non-parametric methods of comparing central tendency measures for the captured responses between the insurance types (Medicare, Medicaid, BCBS, Private) were utilized to determine if significant differences exist. The difference between the baseline (pre-op) of the HOOS and KOOS score was calculated as delta, the difference between baseline and 3 months, baseline and 12 months and 3 months to 12 months. Results: The average overall KOOS and HOOS score at base line (pre-op) was 42.8 (KOOS) and 36.9 (HOOS). The average score at 3 months for KOOS and HOOS was 73.8 and 81.7 respectively. At one year the average score for the KOOS and HOOS was 81.2 and 86.5 respectively. The delta changes for the HOOS score in patients with Medicare at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 45.1, 49.3 and 4.45 respectively. The delta changes for the HOOS score in patients with Medicaid at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 47.7, 42.6 and -0.25 respectively. The delta changes for the HOOS score in patients with BCBS/Manage at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 44.1, 49 and 4.88 respectively. The delta changes for the HOOS score in patients labeled as other/private at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 44.4, 49.7 and 4.81 respectively. The delta changes for the KOOS score in patients with Medicare at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 30.7, 36.7 and 6.03 respectively. The delta changes for the KOOS score in patients with Medicaid at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 26.4, 32.6 and 9.25 respectively. The delta changes for the KOOS score in patients with BCBS/Manage at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 32, 39.4 and 7.79 respectively. The delta changes for the KOOS score in patients with other/private at baseline to 3 months, baseline to 12 months and 3 months to 12 months were 31.3, 39.3 and 7.19 respectively. Conclusion: Overall, the best reported outcome for the HOOS and HOOS was at 1 year, with minimal improvement between the 3 months follow up and 12 month follow up. At one year, there was no significant difference in KOOS/HOOS score for all three payer types. Medicaid and private insurance patients were significantly younger than Medicare patients (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in gender or BMI characteristics. Medicaid payer status was associated with lower improvement in KOOS and HOOS scores at one year post total knee arthroplasty or hip arthroplasty, compared to patients having Medicare or private health insurance. The difference at 3 month or, 3 to 12 months post-surgery was minimal. The data supports performing total knee replacements or hip arthroplasty in the Medicaid population. Additional investigation may shed light on why Medicaid patients demonstrate a slower recovery on patient reported outcome surveys.
