Refugee Odysseys: An Ethnography of Refugee Resettlement in the U.S. After 9-11
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
AbstractBy now scholars, practitioners, government officials and others in the global community have witnessed a number of countries and their populations going through extreme destruction and trying to rebuild in the aftermath. Country case studies are invaluable for their in-depth, continuous look at how a nation-state collective and the individuals who make up that collective recover, regroup, develop, but also remain very harmed for a long time. They must live among and beside their former enemies. Studies of the resettlement of refugees in a third country offer a different view: there are varied populations arriving with different socio-cultural and economic histories and experiences, and different definitions of a normalcy to which they aspire. They are in a setting that is much different than what characterized their pre-war experiences, and they do not have to rebuild out of ashes in the place that they were born. Refugees from various countries resettling in a third country have so much in common with each other from the experience of extreme violence and having to resettle in a foreign land that one key informant suggested that we think about a "refugee ethnicity." Though they would not have wished for them, they have gained numerous new identification possibilities not available to those in the country of origin: U.S. citizen, hybrid, diaspora, cosmopolitan global citizen; refugee/former refugee survivors. But the "fit" of these identities vary, because the receiving society may perceive individuals and families along a continuum of belonging vs. "othering." In the post-9-11 era in the U.S., the "belonging" as a citizen and member of the imagined community of the nation that a refugee or former refugee is able to achieve may be precarious. Will refugees resettling turn out to be vectors of socio-political disease, infecting the new host? Or will they be vectors of development and agents of host revitalization as they realize adversity-activated development in a new environment? The U.S. "host environment" has changed considerably since the modern era of resettlement began in the 1970s and then passed through the dramatic incidents of 9-11. The "hosts" have now also undergone an experience of extreme political violence. U.S. institutions are responding to the events and subsequent wars, and have themselves been changed as they adjust practices and policies in response to the trauma experienced by the people they are meant to serve. Much is in play. The times beg for a better understanding of refugees' social experiences of resettlement in a new country, the forms of suffering and marginalization they face, and the healing processes in which they engage. We need a far better understanding of what it takes to assist refugees as they work to re-constitute social networks, recover economically, find opportunity and meaning, pursue goals, and - with receiving communities--express solidarity across social dividing lines. This dissertation calls out this problematic; and analyzes it at the multi-stakeholder site of refugee resettlement.
Degree ProgramGraduate College
Degree GrantorUniversity of Arizona
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The United Nations and the Palestinian refugees: an analysis of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, 1 May 1950--30 June 1971Gama, Abid Husni, 1943- (The University of Arizona., 1972)
Responding to Refugee Students in K-12 Education: The Role Principals Play in the Integration and Education of Refugee StudentsBailey-Jones, Tsuru (The University of Arizona., 2018)The United States has a long history of resettling refuges in the country. Research indicates that refugee students enter the country and ultimately schools with varied educational experiences including little to no formal education, language barriers to learning, and discrimination (Block, Cross, Riggs, & Gibbs, 2014; Dryden-Petersen, 2015; McBrien, 2005; Roxas, 2011a; Rutter, 2006; Taylor & Sidhu, 2012). Couple this with the differences of culture, the classroom can be an intimidating place for students newly arriving in the country and the educational system responsible for meeting the learning, social and emotional needs. This qualitative exploratory case study illustrates how principals in a large urban school district responded to the needs of newly arrived refugee students and the strategies employed by the principals to integrate and successfully educate these students. One of the largest school districts in Arizona was selected because of its high number of refugee students. In depth interviews were conducted with six participants from a purposive sample identified by the school district. Using the constant comparative method to analyze the interview data and public documents, this study detailed what actions are currently occurring within this school district. Using the findings of this study and Taylor and Sidhu’s (2012) model of good practice in refugee education, a responsiveness model for refugee education was created. The principals focused on the learning, social, and emotional needs of refugee students within their schools. They did not foster their own partnerships with outside agencies but used the partnerships established by the district. An important strategy was creating a welcoming, supportive environment with an emphasis on social justice and inclusiveness. Principals concentrated on acclimating students to the school rules and environment, building relationships with students and parents, promoting refugees in a positive light, and trying to find instructional strategies to better meet the learning needs. Clearly, the principal plays a critical role in creating the environment that can be supportive to the social, emotional, as well as academic learning needs of refugee students. An unintended finding of the study revealed principals were not aware of the district supports such as professional development offerings to address refugee needs. One suggestion for practitioners is to address this disconnection in the district with disseminating information as it most likely affects other areas, not just refugee issues. This study adds to the field of research, as there is a dearth of research on K-12 refugee education from the perspective of the principal.
Refugee Integration in Tucson, AZ: The Role of a Refugee CouncilMoyle, Fernando Brandon Elliot (The University of Arizona., 2003)The purpose of this report is to propose a Refugee Council that could improve the process of refugee resettlement in the cities of Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona. In particular, it provides insight into the ways in which the current administrative arrangement of refugee service providers does not adequately meet the needs of recently resettled refugees. The report identifies ways in which a Refugee Council could address problems identified by those interacting in the refugee arena by creating a direct mode of communication and information exchange between refugees, service providers and municipal governments. The study was conducted through extensive interviews of all eight Refugee Resettlement Agencies operating in Arizona, all six of the Refugee Service Providers within the state, and six of the fifteen registered Mutual Assistance Associations. Additionally, eleven different Refugee Focus groups were attended by sixty-nine refugees from nineteen countries. A strength of the methodology lies in the extensive coverage of the key stakeholders in the refugee arena. A key finding from this research was that representatives from all the organization types interviewed expressed the need for additional levels of networking amongst those operating within the refugee arena. Another important finding is the gap in perception about the services rendered by service providers and the services received by refugees. This gap is borne largely from the current manner in which programs are created and then administered by agencies with little to no input as to ideal practices from other stakeholders. The formation of a Refugee Council, as recommended by this report, could begin to address this gap in perceptions. Based on these findings, the report recommends the formation of a Refugee Council that would address immediate issues of refugee childcare, transportation and training. The creation of a Refugee Council could create the venue for much needed communication as well as allow for collaborative, well-informed decision making for new programs. The report recommends a council formation that could immediately address the need for increased networking amongst all the stakeholders in the field of refugee services.