PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS WHEN IMPLEMENTING TURBO PRODUCT CODE FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION FOR AIRBORNE TELEMETRY
Affiliation
Air Force Flight Test CenterIssue Date
2005-10Keywords
Turbo Product Codes (TPC)Forward Error Correction (FEC)
HYPERMOD
bit error probability
resynchronization
PCM/FM
SOQPSK-TG
Metadata
Show full item recordRights
Copyright © International Foundation for TelemeteringCollection Information
Proceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection.Abstract
Hardware implementing forward error correction (FEC) is currently available for utilization by the airborne telemetry system designer. This paper will discuss the potential benefits along with drawbacks when using this technology. Laboratory testing is supplemented with real-world flight testing. Performance results comparing FEC and non-FEC systems are presented for both IRIG-106 Pulse Code Modulation/Frequency Modulation, PCM/FM, (or Continuous Phase Frequency Shift Keying, CPFSK, with filtering, or ARTM Tier 0) and Shaped Offset Quadrature Phase Shift Keying, Telemetry Group version (SOQPSK-TG or ARTM Tier I) waveforms.Sponsors
International Foundation for TelemeteringISSN
0884-51230074-9079