PSEUDO ERROR DETECTION IN SMART ANTENNA/DIVERSITY SYSTEMS
dc.contributor.author | Haghdad, Mehdi | |
dc.contributor.author | Feher, Kamilo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-14T20:21:19Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-14T20:21:19Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2003-10 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0884-5123 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0074-9079 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605363 | en |
dc.description | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 20-23, 2003 / Riviera Hotel and Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | An implementation of a Pseudo Error Detection (PSED) system is presented and its performance in conjunction with smart antenna and smart diversity systems tested and evaluated. Non redundancy, instant response and relative simplicity make the Pseudo Error Detectors excellent real time error monitoring systems in smart antenna and smart diversity systems. Because of the Non-redundant Error Detection mechanism in Pseudo Error Detectors, we can monitor the error quality without any coding or overhead. The output of the pseudo error detector in AWGN, selective fading Doppler shift and other interference environments is directly correlated to the BER and BLER. This direct correlation makes it a great tool for online error monitoring of a system and can have numerous applications In a PSED the Eye diagram from the demodulator is sampled once per symbol. By monitoring and comparison of the eye at sampled intervals at different thresholds, we would know if an error has occurred. By integrating this result over a period of time we can get the averaged error level. The results provided in this paper were obtained and verified by both MatLab simulations using dynamic simulation techniques and hardware measurements over dynamic channels. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
dc.relation.url | http://www.telemetry.org/ | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Smart antenna | en |
dc.subject | selective fading | en |
dc.subject | Doppler Shift | en |
dc.subject | AWGN | en |
dc.subject | BER | en |
dc.subject | BLER | en |
dc.subject | smart diversity | en |
dc.subject | Pseudo Error Detection | en |
dc.subject | PSED | en |
dc.subject | LEO satellites | en |
dc.title | PSEUDO ERROR DETECTION IN SMART ANTENNA/DIVERSITY SYSTEMS | en_US |
dc.type | text | en |
dc.type | Proceedings | en |
dc.contributor.department | University of California Davis | en |
dc.contributor.department | American SkySat | en |
dc.contributor.department | FQPSK Consortium – Digcom, Inc. | en |
dc.identifier.journal | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings | en |
dc.description.collectioninformation | Proceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection. | en |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-09-11T08:50:41Z | |
html.description.abstract | An implementation of a Pseudo Error Detection (PSED) system is presented and its performance in conjunction with smart antenna and smart diversity systems tested and evaluated. Non redundancy, instant response and relative simplicity make the Pseudo Error Detectors excellent real time error monitoring systems in smart antenna and smart diversity systems. Because of the Non-redundant Error Detection mechanism in Pseudo Error Detectors, we can monitor the error quality without any coding or overhead. The output of the pseudo error detector in AWGN, selective fading Doppler shift and other interference environments is directly correlated to the BER and BLER. This direct correlation makes it a great tool for online error monitoring of a system and can have numerous applications In a PSED the Eye diagram from the demodulator is sampled once per symbol. By monitoring and comparison of the eye at sampled intervals at different thresholds, we would know if an error has occurred. By integrating this result over a period of time we can get the averaged error level. The results provided in this paper were obtained and verified by both MatLab simulations using dynamic simulation techniques and hardware measurements over dynamic channels. |