The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
COMPARING BANDWIDTH REQUIREMENTS FOR DIGITAL BASEBAND SIGNALS
| dc.contributor.author | Houts, R. C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Green, T. A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-15T20:52:47Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2016-04-15T20:52:47Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 1972-10 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0884-5123 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0074-9079 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605575 | en |
| dc.description | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 10-12, 1972 / International Hotel, Los Angeles, California | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper describes the relative, bandwidth requirements of the common digital baseband signaling techniques used for data transmission. Bandwidth considerations include the percentage of total power in a properly encoded PN sequence passed at bandwidths of 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 times the reciprocal of the bit interval, T(b). The signals considered in this study are limited to the binary class, i.e., each decision at the receiver yields one bit of information, in contrast to signaling schemes which encode groups of bits into a given signal amplitude, phase shift, etc. The study compares such signaling techniques as delay modulation (DM), bipolar (BP), biternary (BT), duobinary (DB), pair selected ternary (PST), and time polarity control (TPC) in addition to the conventional NRZ, RZ and BIΦ schemes. It is shown that several of the signals can be transmitted over channels which block frequencies below 10% of the bit rate and still lose less than 5% of the total signal power. Based upon the dual consideration of a large number of regularily-spaced level transitions to assure synchronization plus a minimum of bandwidth and no dc response, it is concluded that DM and PST are the best choices. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
| dc.publisher | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.telemetry.org/ | en |
| dc.rights | Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
| dc.title | COMPARING BANDWIDTH REQUIREMENTS FOR DIGITAL BASEBAND SIGNALS | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en |
| dc.type | Proceedings | en |
| dc.contributor.department | University of Alabama | en |
| dc.identifier.journal | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings | en |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | Proceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection. | en |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-09-11T08:57:54Z | |
| html.description.abstract | This paper describes the relative, bandwidth requirements of the common digital baseband signaling techniques used for data transmission. Bandwidth considerations include the percentage of total power in a properly encoded PN sequence passed at bandwidths of 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 times the reciprocal of the bit interval, T(b). The signals considered in this study are limited to the binary class, i.e., each decision at the receiver yields one bit of information, in contrast to signaling schemes which encode groups of bits into a given signal amplitude, phase shift, etc. The study compares such signaling techniques as delay modulation (DM), bipolar (BP), biternary (BT), duobinary (DB), pair selected ternary (PST), and time polarity control (TPC) in addition to the conventional NRZ, RZ and BIΦ schemes. It is shown that several of the signals can be transmitted over channels which block frequencies below 10% of the bit rate and still lose less than 5% of the total signal power. Based upon the dual consideration of a large number of regularily-spaced level transitions to assure synchronization plus a minimum of bandwidth and no dc response, it is concluded that DM and PST are the best choices. |
