A COMPARISON OF ADAPTIVELY EQUALIZED PCM/FM, SOQPSK, AND MULTI-H CPM IN A MULTIPATH CHANNEL
| dc.contributor.author | Hill, Terrance | |
| dc.contributor.author | Geoghegan, Mark | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-21T16:21:28Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2016-04-21T16:21:28Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2002-10 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0884-5123 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0074-9079 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/606358 | en |
| dc.description | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 21, 2002 / Town & Country Hotel and Conference Center, San Diego, California | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | It is widely recognized that telemetry channels, particularly airborne channels, are afflicted by multipath propagation effects. It has also been shown that adaptive equalization can be highly effective in mitigating these effects. However, numerous other factors influence the behavior of adaptive equalization, and the type of modulation employed is certainly one of these factors. This is particularly true on modulations which exhibit different operating bandwidths. In this paper, we will examine the effect multipath and adaptive equalization for three modulation techniques which are either already in use, or have been proposed, for airborne telemetry. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
| dc.publisher | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.telemetry.org/ | en |
| dc.rights | Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Adaptive Equalization | en |
| dc.subject | Multipath | en |
| dc.subject | PCM | en |
| dc.subject | SOQPSK | en |
| dc.subject | Continuous Phase Modulation | en |
| dc.title | A COMPARISON OF ADAPTIVELY EQUALIZED PCM/FM, SOQPSK, AND MULTI-H CPM IN A MULTIPATH CHANNEL | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en |
| dc.type | Proceedings | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Nova Engineering Inc. | en |
| dc.identifier.journal | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings | en |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | Proceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection. | en |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-12T23:50:43Z | |
| html.description.abstract | It is widely recognized that telemetry channels, particularly airborne channels, are afflicted by multipath propagation effects. It has also been shown that adaptive equalization can be highly effective in mitigating these effects. However, numerous other factors influence the behavior of adaptive equalization, and the type of modulation employed is certainly one of these factors. This is particularly true on modulations which exhibit different operating bandwidths. In this paper, we will examine the effect multipath and adaptive equalization for three modulation techniques which are either already in use, or have been proposed, for airborne telemetry. |
