A COMPARISON OF VIDEO COMPRESSION ALGORITHMS
| dc.contributor.author | Thom, Gary A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Deutermann, Alan R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-04T21:06:43Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-04T21:06:43Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2000-10 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0884-5123 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0074-9079 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/608290 | en |
| dc.description | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 23-26, 2000 / Town & Country Hotel and Conference Center, San Diego, California | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Compressed video is necessary for a variety of telemetry requirements. A large number of competing video compression algorithms exist. This paper compares the ability of these algorithms to meet criteria which are of interest for telemetry applications. Included are: quality, compression, noise susceptibility, motion performance and latency. The algorithms are divided into those which employ inter-frame compression and those which employ intra-frame compression. A video tape presentation will also be presented to illustrate the performance of the video compression algorithms. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
| dc.publisher | International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.telemetry.org/ | en |
| dc.rights | Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering | en |
| dc.subject | Compressed Video | en |
| dc.subject | JPEG | en |
| dc.subject | MPEG | en |
| dc.subject | Wavelets | en |
| dc.subject | Motion Compensation | en |
| dc.title | A COMPARISON OF VIDEO COMPRESSION ALGORITHMS | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en |
| dc.type | Proceedings | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Delta Information Systems, Inc. | en |
| dc.identifier.journal | International Telemetering Conference Proceedings | en |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | Proceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection. | en |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-04-26T10:18:07Z | |
| html.description.abstract | Compressed video is necessary for a variety of telemetry requirements. A large number of competing video compression algorithms exist. This paper compares the ability of these algorithms to meet criteria which are of interest for telemetry applications. Included are: quality, compression, noise susceptibility, motion performance and latency. The algorithms are divided into those which employ inter-frame compression and those which employ intra-frame compression. A video tape presentation will also be presented to illustrate the performance of the video compression algorithms. |
