Semantic annotation of morphological descriptions: an overall strategy
dc.contributor.author | Cui, Hong | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-20T09:01:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-20T09:01:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Cui BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:278 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/278 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1471-2105-11-278 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/610209 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND:Large volumes of morphological descriptions of whole organisms have been created as print or electronic text in a human-readable format. Converting the descriptions into computer- readable formats gives a new life to the valuable knowledge on biodiversity. Research in this area started 20 years ago, yet not sufficient progress has been made to produce an automated system that requires only minimal human intervention but works on descriptions of various plant and animal groups. This paper attempts to examine the hindering factors by identifying the mismatches between existing research and the characteristics of morphological descriptions.RESULTS:This paper reviews the techniques that have been used for automated annotation, reports exploratory results on characteristics of morphological descriptions as a genre, and identifies challenges facing automated annotation systems. Based on these criteria, the paper proposes an overall strategy for converting descriptions of various taxon groups with the least human effort.CONCLUSIONS:A combined unsupervised and supervised machine learning strategy is needed to construct domain ontologies and lexicons and to ultimately achieve automated semantic annotation of morphological descriptions. Further, we suggest that each effort in creating a new description or annotating an individual description collection should be shared and contribute to the "biodiversity information commons" for the Semantic Web. This cannot be done without a sound strategy and a close partnership between and among information scientists and biologists. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en |
dc.relation.url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/278 | en |
dc.rights | © 2010 Cui; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0). | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ | |
dc.title | Semantic annotation of morphological descriptions: an overall strategy | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-2105 | en |
dc.contributor.department | School of Information Resources and Library Science, University of Arizona, 1515 E. First Street, Tucson Arizona, 85719 USA | en |
dc.identifier.journal | BMC Bioinformatics | en |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item is part of the UA Faculty Publications collection. For more information this item or other items in the UA Campus Repository, contact the University of Arizona Libraries at repository@u.library.arizona.edu. | en |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-09-11T10:53:40Z | |
html.description.abstract | BACKGROUND:Large volumes of morphological descriptions of whole organisms have been created as print or electronic text in a human-readable format. Converting the descriptions into computer- readable formats gives a new life to the valuable knowledge on biodiversity. Research in this area started 20 years ago, yet not sufficient progress has been made to produce an automated system that requires only minimal human intervention but works on descriptions of various plant and animal groups. This paper attempts to examine the hindering factors by identifying the mismatches between existing research and the characteristics of morphological descriptions.RESULTS:This paper reviews the techniques that have been used for automated annotation, reports exploratory results on characteristics of morphological descriptions as a genre, and identifies challenges facing automated annotation systems. Based on these criteria, the paper proposes an overall strategy for converting descriptions of various taxon groups with the least human effort.CONCLUSIONS:A combined unsupervised and supervised machine learning strategy is needed to construct domain ontologies and lexicons and to ultimately achieve automated semantic annotation of morphological descriptions. Further, we suggest that each effort in creating a new description or annotating an individual description collection should be shared and contribute to the "biodiversity information commons" for the Semantic Web. This cannot be done without a sound strategy and a close partnership between and among information scientists and biologists. |