Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
Author
Witt, ClaudiaAickin, Mikel
Cherkin, Daniel
Che, Chun
Elder, Charles
Flower, Andrew
Hammerschlag, Richard
Liu, Jian-Ping
Lao, Lixing
Phurrough, Steve
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl
Rubin, Lee
Schnyer, Rosa
Wayne, Peter
Withers, Shelly
Zhao-Xiang, Bian
Young, Jeanette
Berman, Brian
Collaborators
Affiliation
Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCenter for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
Complementary and Integrated Medicine Research Unit, Department of Primary Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Research Department, Oregon College of Oriental Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA
Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
Complementary Medicine Program and Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
The Institute for Integrative Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, China
Patient stakeholder, New York, NY 10001, USA
Issue Date
2014
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BioMed CentralCitation
Witt et al. Trials 2014, 15:169 http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/15/1/169Journal
TrialsRights
© 2014 Witt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0).Collection Information
This item is part of the UA Faculty Publications collection. For more information this item or other items in the UA Campus Repository, contact the University of Arizona Libraries at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
BACKGROUND:There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) on Chinese medicine (CM) to inform clinical and policy decision-making. This document aims to provide consensus advice for the design of CER trials on CM for researchers. It broadly aims to ensure more adequate design and optimal use of resources in generating evidence for CM to inform stakeholder decision-making.METHODS:The Effectiveness Guidance Document (EGD) development was based on multiple consensus procedures (survey, written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, researchers and payers were involved in creating this document.RESULTS:Recommendations were developed for "using available data" and "future clinical studies". The recommendations for future trials focus on randomized trials and cover the following areas: designing CER studies, treatments, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication.CONCLUSION:The present EGD provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER trials on CM and can be applied to single or multi-component treatments. While CONSORT statements provide guidelines for reporting studies, EGDs provide recommendations for the design of future studies and can contribute to a more strategic use of limited research resources, as well as greater consistency in trial design.EISSN
1745-6215Version
Final published versionAdditional Links
http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/15/1/169ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/1745-6215-15-169
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2014 Witt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0).