Microbiology of diabetic foot infections: from Louis Pasteur to 'crime scene investigation'
Affiliation
Deparment of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Science CenterDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, University of Arizona
Department of Surgery, Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), University of Arizona Health Sciences Center
Service of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Department of Medicine, University of Geneva
Division of Medical Sciences, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford
Issue Date
2015Keywords
Molecular diagnosticsDiabetic foot infection
Microbiology
Metagenomics
High-throughput sequencing
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BioMed Central LtdCitation
Spichler et al. BMC Medicine (2015) 13:2 DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0232-0Journal
BMC MedicineRights
© 2015 Spichler et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).Collection Information
This item is part of the UA Faculty Publications collection. For more information this item or other items in the UA Campus Repository, contact the University of Arizona Libraries at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Were he alive today, would Louis Pasteur still champion culture methods he pioneered over 150 years ago for identifying bacterial pathogens? Or, might he suggest that new molecular techniques may prove a better way forward for quickly detecting the true microbial diversity of wounds? As modern clinicians faced with treating complex patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI), should we still request venerated and familiar culture and sensitivity methods, or is it time to ask for newer molecular tests, such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing? Or, are molecular techniques as yet too experimental, non-specific and expensive for current clinical use? While molecular techniques help us to identify more microorganisms from a DFI, can they tell us ‘who done it?', that is, which are the causative pathogens and which are merely colonizers? Furthermore, can molecular techniques provide clinically relevant, rapid information on the virulence of wound isolates and their antibiotic sensitivities? We herein review current knowledge on the microbiology of DFI, from standard culture methods to the current era of rapid and comprehensive ‘crime scene investigation' (CSI) techniques.EISSN
1741-7015Version
Final published versionAdditional Links
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/2ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s12916-014-0232-0
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2015 Spichler et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).

