We are upgrading the repository! We will continue our upgrade in February 2025 - we have taken a break from the upgrade to open some collections for end-of-semester submission. The MS-GIST Master's Reports, SBE Senior Capstones, and UA Faculty Publications collections are currently open for submission. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available in another collection.
Author
Oellrich, A.Walls, R. L.
Cannon, E. K.
Cannon, S. B.
Cooper, L.
Gardiner, J.
Gkoutos, G. V.
Harper, L.
He, M.
Hoehndorf, R.
Jaiswal, P.
Kalberer, S. R.
Lloyd, J. P.
Meinke, D.
Menda, N.
Moore, L.
Nelson, R. T.
Pujar, A.
Lawrence, C. J.
Huala, E.
Affiliation
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome CampusiPlant Collaborative, University of Arizona
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University
USDA-ARS Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Iowa State University
Crop Genome Informatics Lab, Iowa State University
Department of Agronomy, Agronomy Hall, Iowa State University
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University
Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Roy J. Carver Co-Laboratory, Iowa State University
Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University
Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences & Engineering Division and Computational Bioscience Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University
Department of Botany, Oklahoma State University
Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research
Phoenix Bioinformatics
Issue Date
2015
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BioMed CentralCitation
Oellrich et al. Plant Methods (2015) 11:10 DOI 10.1186/s13007-015-0053-yJournal
Plant MethodsRights
© 2015 Oellrich et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).Collection Information
This item is part of the UA Faculty Publications collection. For more information this item or other items in the UA Campus Repository, contact the University of Arizona Libraries at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant phenotype datasets include many different types of data, formats, and terms from specialized vocabularies. Because these datasets were designed for different audiences, they frequently contain language and details tailored to investigators with different research objectives and backgrounds. Although phenotype comparisons across datasets have long been possible on a small scale, comprehensive queries and analyses that span a broad set of reference species, research disciplines, and knowledge domains continue to be severely limited by the absence of a common semantic framework. RESULTS: We developed a workflow to curate and standardize existing phenotype datasets for six plant species, encompassing both model species and crop plants with established genetic resources. Our effort focused on mutant phenotypes associated with genes of known sequence in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Arabidopsis), Zea mays L. subsp. mays (maize), Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (barrel medic or Medicago), Oryza sativa L. (rice), Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean), and Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato). We applied the same ontologies, annotation standards, formats, and best practices across all six species, thereby ensuring that the shared dataset could be used for cross-species querying and semantic similarity analyses. Curated phenotypes were first converted into a common format using taxonomically broad ontologies such as the Plant Ontology, Gene Ontology, and Phenotype and Trait Ontology. We then compared ontology-based phenotypic descriptions with an existing classification system for plant phenotypes and evaluated our semantic similarity dataset for its ability to enhance predictions of gene families, protein functions, and shared metabolic pathways that underlie informative plant phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ontologies, annotation standards, shared formats, and best practices for cross-taxon phenotype data analyses represents a novel approach to plant phenomics that enhances the utility of model genetic organisms and can be readily applied to species with fewer genetic resources and less well-characterized genomes. In addition, these tools should enhance future efforts to explore the relationships among phenotypic similarity, gene function, and sequence similarity in plants, and to make genotype-to-phenotype predictions relevant to plant biology, crop improvement, and potentially even human health.EISSN
1746-4811PubMed ID
25774204PubMed Central ID
PMC4359497Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s13007-015-0053-y [doi]
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2015 Oellrich et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).