Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHonkonen, Marcellaen
dc.contributor.advisorPhan, Hannaen
dc.contributor.authorBhakta, Dharti
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Kalyn
dc.contributor.authorSilvester, Aubrey
dc.contributor.authorHonkonen, Marcella
dc.contributor.authorPhan, Hanna
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-22T15:58:25Z
dc.date.available2016-06-22T15:58:25Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/614103
dc.descriptionClass of 2015 Abstracten
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate for change in vitamin D levels and regimens in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients following implementation of the 2012 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) vitamin D guidelines. Secondary endpoints included clinician adherence to guideline recommendations for treatment and management of vitamin D deficiency. Methods: This retrospective chart review included CF patients with 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels from University of Arizona Medical Center (UAMC) between April 1, 2011-March 31, 2012 and July 1, 2012-June 30, 2013. Total 25(OH)D levels and vitamin D regimens were collected along with data on respiratory cultures, pulmonary function, and hospitalizations. Data were analyzed by Student’s T-tests and chi square analyses. Results: A total of 62 patients were included in the study. Mean 25(OH)D levels did not significantly differ between the study periods (28.9±10.5 ng/mL pre-guideline and 27.0±9.1 ng/mL post-guideline, p=0.158). Cholecalciferol use increased post-guideline (57.1%) versus pre-guideline (75.8%, p=0.027). Post-guideline cholecalciferol doses increased to 2836.5±2669.4 international units [IU] daily compared to 1518.0±912.0 IU daily pre-guideline (p<0.001). Clinician adherence to dose titration recommendations resulted in significant 25(OH)D level elevations (28.3±8.9 ng/mL versus 24.7±9.0, p=0.047). Conclusions: The prescribing pattern of clinicians significantly changed to reflect vitamin D regimens suggested by CFF guidelines. This finding suggests that had sufficient time been allowed following guideline implementation, a significant difference in 25(OH)D levels would have resulted. Additional research is needed concerning the effect of the guidelines on vitamin D status, clinical outcomes, and comorbidities.
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectvitamin Den
dc.subjectcystic fibrosisen
dc.subjectimplementationen
dc.subject2012 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Guidelinesen
dc.subject.meshCystic Fibrosis
dc.subject.meshVitamin D
dc.titleImpact on Vitamin D Status in Cystic Fibrosis Patients After Implementation of 2012 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Guidelinesen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeElectronic Reporten
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Arizonaen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item is part of the Pharmacy Student Research Projects collection, made available by the College of Pharmacy and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact Jennifer Martin, Librarian and Clinical Instructor, Pharmacy Practice and Science, jenmartin@email.arizona.edu.en
html.description.abstractObjectives: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate for change in vitamin D levels and regimens in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients following implementation of the 2012 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) vitamin D guidelines. Secondary endpoints included clinician adherence to guideline recommendations for treatment and management of vitamin D deficiency. Methods: This retrospective chart review included CF patients with 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels from University of Arizona Medical Center (UAMC) between April 1, 2011-March 31, 2012 and July 1, 2012-June 30, 2013. Total 25(OH)D levels and vitamin D regimens were collected along with data on respiratory cultures, pulmonary function, and hospitalizations. Data were analyzed by Student’s T-tests and chi square analyses. Results: A total of 62 patients were included in the study. Mean 25(OH)D levels did not significantly differ between the study periods (28.9±10.5 ng/mL pre-guideline and 27.0±9.1 ng/mL post-guideline, p=0.158). Cholecalciferol use increased post-guideline (57.1%) versus pre-guideline (75.8%, p=0.027). Post-guideline cholecalciferol doses increased to 2836.5±2669.4 international units [IU] daily compared to 1518.0±912.0 IU daily pre-guideline (p<0.001). Clinician adherence to dose titration recommendations resulted in significant 25(OH)D level elevations (28.3±8.9 ng/mL versus 24.7±9.0, p=0.047). Conclusions: The prescribing pattern of clinicians significantly changed to reflect vitamin D regimens suggested by CFF guidelines. This finding suggests that had sufficient time been allowed following guideline implementation, a significant difference in 25(OH)D levels would have resulted. Additional research is needed concerning the effect of the guidelines on vitamin D status, clinical outcomes, and comorbidities.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record