Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuth, Gaylord K.
dc.contributor.authorTokunow, Lawrence S.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T23:11:37Z
dc.date.available2016-07-01T23:11:37Z
dc.date.issued1981-10
dc.identifier.issn0884-5123
dc.identifier.issn0074-9079
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/615437
dc.descriptionInternational Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 13-15, 1981 / Bahia Hotel, San Diego, Californiaen_US
dc.description.abstractFrequency hopping (FH) is a powerful antijam spread spectrum modulation when combined with multiple-frequency-shift-keying (MFSK) and error correction coding. This paper determines the antijam message error rate performance of various formats of FH/MFSK with convolutional error correction coding techniques. The worst case jammer is determined for each signalling format and coding technique and the antijam performance for all configurations are compared.
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherInternational Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.telemetry.org/en
dc.rightsCopyright © International Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.titleANTIJAM PERFORMANCE OF CODED FH/MFSKen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeProceedingsen
dc.identifier.journalInternational Telemetering Conference Proceedingsen
dc.description.collectioninformationProceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection.en
refterms.dateFOA2018-04-26T01:07:42Z
html.description.abstractFrequency hopping (FH) is a powerful antijam spread spectrum modulation when combined with multiple-frequency-shift-keying (MFSK) and error correction coding. This paper determines the antijam message error rate performance of various formats of FH/MFSK with convolutional error correction coding techniques. The worst case jammer is determined for each signalling format and coding technique and the antijam performance for all configurations are compared.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ITC_1981_81-36-1.pdf
Size:
102.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record