Name:
Waser_et_al-2016-Ecology.pdf
Size:
286.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & EnvironmIssue Date
2016-06Keywords
droughtexperiment
hummingbird visitation
nectar neighborhood
nectar production
pollen limitation
pollen neighborhood
pollen production
pollen receipt
pollination success
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WILEY-BLACKWELLCitation
Drought, pollen and nectar availability, and pollination success 2016, 97 (6):1400 EcologyJournal
EcologyRights
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Pollination success of animal-pollinated flowers depends on rate of pollinator visits and on pollen deposition per visit, both of which should vary with the pollen and nectar "neighborhoods" of a plant, i.e., with pollen and nectar availability in nearby plants. One determinant of these neighborhoods is per-flower production of pollen and nectar, which is likely to respond to environmental influences. In this study, we explored environmental effects on pollen and nectar production and on pollination success in order to follow up a surprising result from a previous study: flowers of Ipomopsis aggregata received less pollen in years of high visitation by their hummingbird pollinators. A new analysis of the earlier data indicated that high bird visitation corresponded to drought years. We hypothesized that drought might contribute to the enigmatic prior result if it decreases both nectar and pollen production: in dry years, low nectar availability could cause hummingbirds to visit flowers at a higher rate, and low pollen availability could cause them to deposit less pollen per visit. A greenhouse experiment demonstrated that drought does reduce both pollen and nectar production by I. aggregata flowers. This result was corroborated across 6 yr of variable precipitation and soil moisture in four unmanipulated field populations. In addition, experimental removal of pollen from flowers reduced the pollen received by nearby flowers. We conclude that there is much to learn about how abiotic and biotic environmental drivers jointly affect pollen and nectar production and availability, and how this contributes to pollen and nectar neighborhoods and thus influences pollination success.Note
Authors may post their articles to their personal or home institution’s website or institutional repository and may make and distribute photocopies of such articles.ISSN
00129658Version
Final published versionAdditional Links
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1890/15-1423.1ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1890/15-1423.1