Improving the detectability of oxygen saturation level targets for preterm neonates: A laboratory test of tremolo and beacon sonifications
Name:
NNPO6-Writeup-ApplErgon-v26-Ch ...
Size:
778.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Deschamps, Marie-LysSanderson, Penelope
Hinckfuss, Kelly
Browning, Caitlin
Loeb, Robert G.
Liley, Helen
Liu, David
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept AnesthesiolIssue Date
2016-09
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTDCitation
Improving the detectability of oxygen saturation level targets for preterm neonates: A laboratory test of tremolo and beacon sonifications 2016, 56:160 Applied ErgonomicsJournal
Applied ErgonomicsRights
Copyright © 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Recent guidelines recommend oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) levels of 90%-95% for preterm neonates on supplemental oxygen but it is difficult to discern such levels with current pulse oximetry sonifications. We tested (1) whether adding levels of tremolo to a conventional log-linear pulse oximetry sonification would improve identification of SpO(2) ranges, and (2) whether adding a beacon reference tone to conventional pulse oximetry confuses listeners about the direction of change. Participants using the Tremolo (94%) or Beacon (81%) sonifications identified SpO(2) range significantly more accurately than participants using the LogLinear sonification (52%). The Beaton sonification did not confuse participants about direction of change. The Tremolo sonification may have advantages over the Beacon sonification for monitoring SpO(2) of preterm neonates, but both must be further tested with clinicians in clinically representative scenarios, and with different levels of ambient noise and distractions. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Note
Available online 14 April 2016. 24 month embargo.ISSN
00036870Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Australian Research Council through Discovery Project [DP140101822]Additional Links
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003687016300588ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.apergo.2016.03.013
