Writing Tutoring in Higher Education: An Exploratory Study on the Effectiveness of Directive and Nondirective Tutoring
Issue Date
2016Keywords
College WritingDirective Tutoring
Nondirective Tutoring
Tutoring Effectiveness
Writing Tutoring
Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences
Adult Writing
Advisor
Alt, MaryMetadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The University of Arizona.Rights
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.Abstract
Writing academic papers continues to be a struggle for college students. Many universities provide tutoring services for a range of academic subjects including writing. Currently, there are few experimental studies to support the effectiveness of two frequently used tutoring methods: directive and nondirective tutoring. Based on existing knowledge about the acquisition of written language, this study aims to determine if directive (expert-directed) tutoring is more effective than nondirective (student-directed) tutoring in improving students' writing skills. In addition, this study sought to determine if changes in macrostructure and microstructure correlated to instructor assigned grades. Participants were recruited from undergraduate courses that included an initial paper and a revised final paper. Participants who chose 30-min of free tutoring were randomly assigned to one of the tutoring conditions: expert-directed (ED) or student-directed (SD). Participants who did not choose to receive tutoring were allocated to the control condition. There were 16 participants: ED group [n=7], SD group [n=7], and control group [n=2]. A descriptive analysis on measures of microstructure, paragraph structure, overall rating, and instructor assigned grades for the initial and final paper was conducted for 6 participants: ED group [n=2], SD group [n=2], and control group [n=2]. On measures of microstructure, the ED group decreased the average number of errors, the SD group maintained the same number of errors, and the control group increased the number of errors. Both the ED and SD tutoring groups decreased the average number of internal paragraph structure errors, while the control group maintained the same number of errors. All three groups received an increase in average overall rating; however, the control group received the smallest increase. All three groups received a comparable increase in average instructor assigned grade. The preliminary results suggest that tutoring is beneficial compared to no tutoring. Furthermore, there does not appear to be a relation between changes in the measures used in this study (microstructure, paragraph structure, overall rating) and instructor assigned grades. Further examination on whether directive tutoring is more effective than nondirective is required. The theories supporting directive tutoring (i.e. writing development, Vygotsky's zone of proximal development, learning theory) suggest that this method would be more effective than nondirective tutoring. In addition, research into the relation between grades and changes in macrostructure and microstructure is warranted.Type
textElectronic Thesis
Degree Name
M.S.Degree Level
mastersDegree Program
Graduate CollegeSpeech, Language, & Hearing Sciences
Degree Grantor
University of ArizonaCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
ANALYSIS OF A COMMUNICATIVELY ORIENTED ESL PROGRAM UTILIZING NATIVE-SPEAKING PEER TUTORS.The purpose of this study was to design and implement a theory-based, communicative ESL curriculum and to study the effects of the curriculum on a student population consisting of adult Mexican and Japanese students in a four-week intensive program. The review of the related literature revealed that basic research in linguistics, psycholinguistics, and second language acquisition is beginning to have considerable influence on second language teaching theory and methodology, and, as a result, a new second language learning paradigm is emerging: teaching for communicative competence. Leading researchers have suggested some theoretical guidelines for curriculum design, textbook preparation, and classroom procedures that would be more conducive to second language learning than the traditional audiolingual approaches. The following features were incorporated into the four-week program at the Center for English as a Second Language at The University of Arizona and constituted the treatment of the students in this study: (1) textbooks of a notional-functional syllabus design were adopted and the schedule was designed to maximize integration of the material and reinforcement of target themes and structures, (2) emphasis was placed on personalized discussion, conversation, and language use, and (3) forty American high school and college students worked with students daily as "tutors" or "conversation partners" on a one-to-one basis, and also participated in numerous social activities with students. The effects of the program on the students' gains in English language proficiency (ELP) were studied using the Comprehensive English Language Test (CELT) and the students' personal reactions to the program were measured using a program evaluation questionnaire. The findings of the study were that: (1) the students showed significant gains in ELP over the four-week period, and the largest gains were in listening comprehension skills; (2) the Mexican students showed significantly higher gains than the Japanese students in all skills measured; (3) the gains made by the Japanese students in the 1983 program were significantly lower than gains made by comparable Japanese groups in previous four-week CESL programs; and (4) a program of this type may be more positively accepted by Mexicans than by Japanese; and these attitudes may effect ELP gains. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.)
