AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Econ
Univ Arizona, Ecol Sci Lab
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA
CitationReference Point Heterogeneity. 2016, 7:1347 Front Psychol
JournalFrontiers in psychology
Rights© 2016 Terzi, Koedijk, Noussair and Pownall. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractIt is well-established that, when confronted with a decision to be taken under risk, individuals use reference payoff levels as important inputs. The purpose of this paper is to study which reference points characterize decisions in a setting in which there are several plausible reference levels of payoff. We report an experiment, in which we investigate which of four potential reference points: (1) a population average payoff level, (2) the announced expected payoff of peers in a similar decision situation, (3) a historical average level of earnings that others have received in the same task, and (4) an announced anticipated individual payoff level, best describes decisions in a decontextualized risky decision making task. We find heterogeneity among individuals in the reference points they employ. The population average payoff level is the modal reference point, followed by experimenter's stated expectation of a participant's individual earnings, followed in turn by the average earnings of other participants in previous sessions of the same experiment. A sizeable share of individuals show multiple reference points simultaneously. The reference point that best fits the choices of the individual is not affected by a shock to her income.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsCenter of Economic Research at Tilburg University
- Payoff Information Biases a Fast Guess Process in Perceptual Decision Making under Deadline Pressure: Evidence from Behavior, Evoked Potentials, and Quantitative Model Comparison.
- Authors: Noorbaloochi S, Sharon D, McClelland JL
- Issue date: 2015 Aug 5
- Is payoff necessarily weighted by probability when making a risky choice? Evidence from functional connectivity analysis.
- Authors: Rao LL, Li S, Jiang T, Zhou Y
- Issue date: 2012
- Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.
- Authors: Bosworth B, Burtless G, Steuerle E
- Issue date: 2000
- The role of cognitive abilities in decisions from experience: Age differences emerge as a function of choice set size.
- Authors: Frey R, Mata R, Hertwig R
- Issue date: 2015 Sep
- Higher-order risk preferences in social settings.
- Authors: Heinrich T, Mayrhofer T
- Issue date: 2018