Efficacy of Pharmacokinetics-Directed Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide Conditioning and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma: Comparison of a Multicenter Phase II Study and CIBMTR Outcomes.
AuthorFlowers, Christopher R
Costa, Luciano J
Pasquini, Marcelo C
Shore, Tsiporah B
Freytes, Cesar O
Shea, Thomas C
Horwitz, Mitchell E
Fay, Joseph W
Yeh, Rosa F
Rodriguez, Tulio E
Yeager, Andrew M
Pulsipher, Michael A
Chen, Andy I
Smith, Angela J
Waller, Edmund K
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Ctr Canc, Blood & Marrow Transplantat Program
Autologous stem cell transplantation
Stem cell transplantation
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
CitationEfficacy of Pharmacokinetics-Directed Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide Conditioning and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma: Comparison of a Multicenter Phase II Study and CIBMTR Outcomes. 2016, 22 (7):1197-205 Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant.
JournalBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Rights© 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractBusulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCyE) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This multicenter, phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of BuCyE with individually adjusted busulfan based on preconditioning pharmacokinetics. The study initially enrolled Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients ages 18 to 80 years but was amended due to high early treatment-related mortality (TRM) in patients > 65 years. BuCyE outcomes were compared with contemporaneous recipients of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Two hundred seven subjects with HL (n = 66) or NHL (n = 141) were enrolled from 32 centers in North America, and 203 underwent ASCT. Day 100 TRM for all subjects (n = 203), patients > 65 years (n = 17), and patients ≤ 65 years (n = 186) were 4.5%, 23.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 33% for HL and 58%, 77%, and 43% for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 63), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 29), and follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 23), respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year overall survival (OS) were 76% for HL and 65%, 89%, and 89% for DLBCL, MCL, and FL, respectively. In the matched analysis rates of 2-year TRM were 3.3% for BuCyE and 3.9% for BEAM, and there were no differences in outcomes for NHL. Patients with HL had lower rates of 2-year PFS with BuCyE, 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%), than with BEAM, 59% (95% CI, 52% to 66%), with no differences in TRM or OS. BuCyE provided adequate disease control and safety in B cell NHL patients ≤ 65 years but produced worse PFS in HL patients when compared with BEAM.
NoteOpen access article.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
- Impact of conditioning regimen on outcomes for patients with lymphoma undergoing high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.
- Authors: Chen YB, Lane AA, Logan B, Zhu X, Akpek G, Aljurf M, Artz A, Bredeson CN, Cooke KR, Ho VT, Lazarus HM, Olsson R, Saber W, McCarthy P, Pasquini MC
- Issue date: 2015 Jun
- Carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan versus a newly designed intravenous busulfan-based Busulfex, etoposide and melphalan conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic cell transplant: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in advanced Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
- Authors: Sakellari I, Mallouri D, Batsis I, Apostolou C, Konstantinou V, Abela EM, Douka V, Marvaki A, Karypidis K, Iskas M, Baliakas P, Kaloyannidis P, Yannaki E, Sotiropoulos D, Kouvatseas G, Smias C, Anagnostopoulos A
- Issue date: 2015
- Thiotepa, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine, and Melphalan (TECAM) Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphoma.
- Authors: Grisariu S, Shapira MY, Or R, Avni B
- Issue date: 2018 Apr
- BEAM versus BUCYVP16 Conditioning before Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma.
- Authors: Singer S, Dean R, Zhao Q, Sharma N, Abounader D, Elder P, Hofmeister CC, Benson DM, Rosko A, Penza S, Andritsos L, Vasu S, Jaglowski S, William BM, Bolwell B, Pohlman B, Kalaycio M, Jagadeesh D, Hill B, Sobecks R, Devine SM, Majhail NS, Efebera YA
- Issue date: 2019 Jun
- Novel regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for the management of adults with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma: alternatives to BEAM conditioning.
- Authors: Isidori A, Christofides A, Visani G
- Issue date: 2016 Nov